Mapping personalized risk-stratified prevention approaches: A JA PreventNCD Project scoping review

Abstract Background Personalized prevention is recognized for improving the effectiveness and equity of non-communicable diseases (NCD) interventions. Risk stratification tailors prevention to individual characteristics, but its consistent application remains unclear. Within the Joint Action PreventNCD we examine the scope and implementation of personalized risk-stratified recommendations. Methods We conducted a scoping review on strategies targeting major NCDs (cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health conditions), based on stratification by tobacco use, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, alcohol use, genetic factors. A tailored PCC framework guided the inclusion across contexts limited to recommendations, guidelines, consensus statements published from 2019 to 2024. Searches covered PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and first 100 results from Google and Google Scholar. Results We extracted 769 approaches from 138 documents: 15.2% addressed primary prevention, 29.3% secondary, 55.5% tertiary. Cancer and CVDs were the most targeted (44.2% and 45.5%). A level of evidence to support formulation was reported in 62.5%, with 20.2% classified as high quality. Overall, stratification was mainly based on genetic factors (50.3%), followed by tobacco use (3.6%), unhealthy diet (2.5%), alcohol use (0.8%), physical inactivity (0.5%). Additionally, 34.7% were stratified only by disease presence exclusively for tertiary prevention. Only 7.5% applied a risk score combining multiple factors for risk stratification. Conclusions The integration of personalized approaches in prevention is increasing across different branches of medicine. Modifiable risk-based stratification is still underused, highlighting missed opportunities for early intervention. A shift toward more balanced, evidence-informed, actionable prevention strategies, particularly in primary and secondary prevention, is crucial to enhance equity and impact across populations. Key messages • Consideration of modifiable risk factors is important when developing risk-stratified personalized prevention approaches. • Recommendations should be based on strong evidence to ensure the effectiveness of interventions.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1200
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mapping personalized risk-stratified prevention approaches: A JA PreventNCD Project scoping review

European Journal of Public Health
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Mapping personalized risk-stratified prevention approaches: A JA PreventNCD Project scoping review

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Personalized prevention is recognized for improving the effectiveness and equity of non-communicable diseases (NCD) interventions. Risk stratification tailors prevention to individual characteristics, but its consistent application remains unclear. Within the Joint Action PreventNCD we examine the scope and implementation of personalized risk-stratified recommendations. Methods We conducted a scoping review on strategies targeting major NCDs (cancer, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), diabetes, chronic respiratory diseases, mental health conditions), based on stratification by tobacco use, physical inactivity, unhealthy diet, alcohol use, genetic factors. A tailored PCC framework guided the inclusion across contexts limited to recommendations, guidelines, consensus statements published from 2019 to 2024. Searches covered PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and first 100 results from Google and Google Scholar. Results We extracted 769 approaches from 138 documents: 15.2% addressed primary prevention, 29.3% secondary, 55.5% tertiary. Cancer and CVDs were the most targeted (44.2% and 45.5%). A level of evidence to support formulation was reported in 62.5%, with 20.2% classified as high quality. Overall, stratification was mainly based on genetic factors (50.3%), followed by tobacco use (3.6%), unhealthy diet (2.5%), alcohol use (0.8%), physical inactivity (0.5%). Additionally, 34.7% were stratified only by disease presence exclusively for tertiary prevention. Only 7.5% applied a risk score combining multiple factors for risk stratification. Conclusions The integration of personalized approaches in prevention is increasing across different branches of medicine. Modifiable risk-based stratification is still underused, highlighting missed opportunities for early intervention. A shift toward more balanced, evidence-informed, actionable prevention strategies, particularly in primary and secondary prevention, is crucial to enhance equity and impact across populations. Key messages • Consideration of modifiable risk factors is important when developing risk-stratified personalized prevention approaches. • Recommendations should be based on strong evidence to ensure the effectiveness of interventions.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.