The value of Australian aquatic ecosystem services

• Australian valuation of aquatic ecosystems focused mainly on provisioning and cultural services. • Valuation of Australian aquatic ecosystems is mostly limited to New South Wales and Victoria. • Erosion protection is the highest valued Australian service, exceeding global median values. • Gaps in Australian research exist in traditional services, such as raw materials. • Economic valuation studies on Australian shellfish reefs remain limited. Aquatic ecosystems provide valuable ecosystem services to human wellbeing. Nonetheless, anthropogenic pressures cause significant impacts on their environment and biodiversity. Assigning economic value to these services increases awareness for ecosystem protection, informing policies and planning. Currently, there is no comprehensive review of the economic valuation of Australia’s aquatic ecosystems, despite it having the world’s third largest marine area. This study provides a review of the economic value of ecosystem services in seven aquatic ecosystems in Australia, namely: mangroves, saltmarsh, seagrass, kelp, shellfish reef, freshwater wetlands and open waterways. Over 90% of the economic value estimates in Australia were conducted for kelp, mangroves, saltmarsh and seagrass, whereas limited information was identified for shellfish reef habitats. Available research is concentrated in New South Wales and Victoria, with limited research in Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Provisioning and cultural services represented over 70% of researched ecosystem services in Australia, while habitat and biodiversity services were rarely identified. Typical provisioning and cultural services identified globally, such as raw materials or bequest values were not identified in the Australian literature. Australian economic values were typically below the global 50th percentile for provisioning, cultural and climate regulation services. In contrast, the use of aquatic ecosystems for storm and erosion protection are often one of the highest economic valuations worldwide with a median Australian value over $400,000/ha/year for mangrove, saltmarsh and seagrass habitats. Overall, the compiled results highlight a potential undervaluation of aquatic ecosystem services in Australia and important research gaps for further investigation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2025.101786
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The value of Australian aquatic ecosystem services

2 citations
Ecosystem Services
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.21
article

The value of Australian aquatic ecosystem services

article en
2 citations

Abstract

• Australian valuation of aquatic ecosystems focused mainly on provisioning and cultural services. • Valuation of Australian aquatic ecosystems is mostly limited to New South Wales and Victoria. • Erosion protection is the highest valued Australian service, exceeding global median values. • Gaps in Australian research exist in traditional services, such as raw materials. • Economic valuation studies on Australian shellfish reefs remain limited. Aquatic ecosystems provide valuable ecosystem services to human wellbeing. Nonetheless, anthropogenic pressures cause significant impacts on their environment and biodiversity. Assigning economic value to these services increases awareness for ecosystem protection, informing policies and planning. Currently, there is no comprehensive review of the economic valuation of Australia’s aquatic ecosystems, despite it having the world’s third largest marine area. This study provides a review of the economic value of ecosystem services in seven aquatic ecosystems in Australia, namely: mangroves, saltmarsh, seagrass, kelp, shellfish reef, freshwater wetlands and open waterways. Over 90% of the economic value estimates in Australia were conducted for kelp, mangroves, saltmarsh and seagrass, whereas limited information was identified for shellfish reef habitats. Available research is concentrated in New South Wales and Victoria, with limited research in Western Australia and the Northern Territory. Provisioning and cultural services represented over 70% of researched ecosystem services in Australia, while habitat and biodiversity services were rarely identified. Typical provisioning and cultural services identified globally, such as raw materials or bequest values were not identified in the Australian literature. Australian economic values were typically below the global 50th percentile for provisioning, cultural and climate regulation services. In contrast, the use of aquatic ecosystems for storm and erosion protection are often one of the highest economic valuations worldwide with a median Australian value over $400,000/ha/year for mangrove, saltmarsh and seagrass habitats. Overall, the compiled results highlight a potential undervaluation of aquatic ecosystem services in Australia and important research gaps for further investigation.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 76
Griffith University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), New South Wales Department of Primary Industries (AU), Manly Hospital (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development (AU), University College London (GB), Southern Cross University (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
2.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.