The Sahel States Military Intervention in Politics: The Conflict of Vested Colonial Interest and National Security

The earth-rocking military interventions in the politics of Sahelian states constitutes a critical challenge to democratic consolidation and national sovereignty. Despite transitions to civilian rule in many African countries, the Sahel continues to experience recurrent military takeovers, raising concerns over underlying causes and external influences. This paper examined the Sahel States Military intervention in politics: the conflict of Vested Colonial interest and National Security. The objective is to explore the root causes of military intervention, assess the influence of former colonial powers, analyze, and recommend strategies for democratic strengthening. The Theoretical framework for the study is anchored on 'Neo-colonialism Theory' propounded by Kwame Nkrummah (1965), methodologically the study is hintched on a descriptive-historical research design to trace the patterns and implications of foreign interference and military dominance in post-colonial Sahelian politics. Data were gathered through secondary sources, including scholarly journals, books, archival records, and credible internet sources. The data were qualitatively analyzed using content analysis to interpret recurring themes and patterns relevant to the research question. Research findings revealed that weak democratic institutions, elite corruption, ethnic tensions, and foreign strategic interests particularly those of former colonial powers are significant drivers of military coups. Furthermore, military regimes often undermine governance quality and restrict national sovereignty, while external actors perpetuate instability under the guise of security cooperation. The study concludes that for the Sahel to achieve political stability, regional governments must address internal governance deficits and reduce foreign dependency. The paper recommended strengthening democratic institutions, promoting inclusive governance, enhancing youth political engagement, and limiting foreign political manipulation.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17458602
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Sahel States Military Intervention in Politics: The Conflict of Vested Colonial Interest and National Security

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

The Sahel States Military Intervention in Politics: The Conflict of Vested Colonial Interest and National Security

article en

Abstract

The earth-rocking military interventions in the politics of Sahelian states constitutes a critical challenge to democratic consolidation and national sovereignty. Despite transitions to civilian rule in many African countries, the Sahel continues to experience recurrent military takeovers, raising concerns over underlying causes and external influences. This paper examined the Sahel States Military intervention in politics: the conflict of Vested Colonial interest and National Security. The objective is to explore the root causes of military intervention, assess the influence of former colonial powers, analyze, and recommend strategies for democratic strengthening. The Theoretical framework for the study is anchored on 'Neo-colonialism Theory' propounded by Kwame Nkrummah (1965), methodologically the study is hintched on a descriptive-historical research design to trace the patterns and implications of foreign interference and military dominance in post-colonial Sahelian politics. Data were gathered through secondary sources, including scholarly journals, books, archival records, and credible internet sources. The data were qualitatively analyzed using content analysis to interpret recurring themes and patterns relevant to the research question. Research findings revealed that weak democratic institutions, elite corruption, ethnic tensions, and foreign strategic interests particularly those of former colonial powers are significant drivers of military coups. Furthermore, military regimes often undermine governance quality and restrict national sovereignty, while external actors perpetuate instability under the guise of security cooperation. The study concludes that for the Sahel to achieve political stability, regional governments must address internal governance deficits and reduce foreign dependency. The paper recommended strengthening democratic institutions, promoting inclusive governance, enhancing youth political engagement, and limiting foreign political manipulation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Nigeria (NG)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.