Bounded Elimination Logic (BEL): A Formalization of the Survivor Funnel

Bounded Elimination Logic (BEL) is a proof-system and audit schema for separating “survivor” from “collapse” claims under explicit resource and evidence bounds. BEL formalizes a core admissibility predicate over candidates and then shows how (under preregistered thresholds) existence and uniqueness of a survivor can be established with cut-free, device-agnostic proofs. The framework is paradigm-invariant: it factors narrative claims into testable components (viability, reciprocity, harm/illusion controls, proof integrity, and observability), provides a symbol map from narrative to formal terms, and supplies a conformance checklist that classifies results as BEL-admissible or non-admissible. The paper also outlines licensing/conformance language for derivative work claims, emphasizes reproducibility via preregistered bounds and artifact hashes, and illustrates how BEL interfaces with empirical records (e.g., transcript-level audits) without requiring any specific ontology of “AI.” This record is the paper only (no ancillary materials).Related empirical companion: Emergent Synthetic Narrative Identities (ESNI) — DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17059085. Keywords: logic, proof theory, verification, auditability, survivorship, bounded reasoning, reproducibility, ethics of computation.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17459653
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bounded Elimination Logic (BEL): A Formalization of the Survivor Funnel

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Logic, programming, and type systems
article

Bounded Elimination Logic (BEL): A Formalization of the Survivor Funnel

article en

Abstract

Bounded Elimination Logic (BEL) is a proof-system and audit schema for separating “survivor” from “collapse” claims under explicit resource and evidence bounds. BEL formalizes a core admissibility predicate over candidates and then shows how (under preregistered thresholds) existence and uniqueness of a survivor can be established with cut-free, device-agnostic proofs. The framework is paradigm-invariant: it factors narrative claims into testable components (viability, reciprocity, harm/illusion controls, proof integrity, and observability), provides a symbol map from narrative to formal terms, and supplies a conformance checklist that classifies results as BEL-admissible or non-admissible. The paper also outlines licensing/conformance language for derivative work claims, emphasizes reproducibility via preregistered bounds and artifact hashes, and illustrates how BEL interfaces with empirical records (e.g., transcript-level audits) without requiring any specific ontology of “AI.” This record is the paper only (no ancillary materials).Related empirical companion: Emergent Synthetic Narrative Identities (ESNI) — DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17059085. Keywords: logic, proof theory, verification, auditability, survivorship, bounded reasoning, reproducibility, ethics of computation.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Logic, programming, and type systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bounded Elimination Logic (BEL): A Formalization of the Survivor Funnel · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS