Comparisons of Differential Code Bias (DCB) Estimates and Low-Earth-Orbit (LEO)-Topside Ionosphere Extraction Based on Two Different Topside Ionosphere Processing Methods

Global navigation satellite system (GNSS) differential code bias (DCB) and topside ionosphere vertical electron content (VEC) can be estimated using onboard data from low-earth-orbit (LEO) satellites. These satellites provide the potential to make up for the lack of ground-based stations in the oceanic and polar regions and establish a high-precision global ionosphere model. In order to study the influences of different LEO-topside VEC processing methods on estimates, we creatively analyzed and compared the results and accuracy of the DCBs and LEO-topside VEC estimates using two topside VEC solutions—the SH-topside VEC (spherical harmonic-topside vertical electron content) and EP-topside VEC (epoch parameter-topside vertical electron content) methods. Some conclusions are drawn as follows. (1) Using GRACE-A data (400 km in 2016), the monthly stabilities (STDs) of GPS satellite DCBs and LEO receiver DCBs using the EP-topside VEC method are better than those using the SH-topside VEC method. For JASON-2 data (1350 km), the STD results of GPS DCBs using the SH-topside VEC method are slightly superior to those using the EP-topside VEC method, and LEO DCBs using the two methods have similar STD results. However, the root mean square (RMS) results for GPS DCBs using the SH-topside VEC model relative to the Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE) products are slightly superior to those using the EP-topside VEC method. (2) The peak ranges of the actual GRACE-A-topside VEC results using the SH-topside VEC and EP-topside VEC methods are within 42 and 35 TECU, respectively, while the peak ranges of the JASON-2-topside VEC results are both within 6 TECU. Additionally, only the SH-topside VEC model results are displayed due to the EP-topside VEC method not modeling VEC. Due to the difference in orbital altitude, the results and distributions of the GRACE-topside VECs differ from those of the JASON-topside VECs, with the former being more consistent with the ground-based results, indicating that there may be different height structures in the LEO-topside VECs. In addition, we applied the IRI-GIM (International Reference Ionosphere model–Global Ionosphere Map) method to compare the LEO-based topside VEC results, which indicate that the accuracy of GRACE-A-topside VEC using the EP-topside VEC method is better than that using the SH-topside VEC method, whereas for JASON-2, the two methods have similar accuracy. Meanwhile, we note that the temporal and spatial resolutions of the SH-topside VEC method are higher than those of the EP-topside VEC method, and the former has a wide range of usability and predictive characteristics. The latter seems to correspond to the single-epoch VEC mean of the former to some extent.