Principles of tax regulation of the ecosystem of technological development in the context of ensuring technological security of Russia

The subject of the article is the principles of taxation and tax regulation of the provision of the ecosystem of technological development. The work considers the architecture of the ecosystem of technological development, provides its constituent elements of the relationship and functions of the constituent elements of the ecosystem. The main subjects (technology companies) and peripheral (other organizations, government, financial institutions, as well as academic and research organizations) are identified as elements of the ecosystem. The author's classification of types of tax support for ecosystems of technological development is given: functional, sectoral, territorial, cluster, zonal, subject-sectoral, point. The author characterized the interaction of fiscal and monetary policies, on the basis of which a conclusion was made about the advantage of fiscal policy (fiscal leadership regime) over monetary policy (monetary leadership regime). The study uses general scientific methods: abstraction, analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction. Among the specific scientific methods, tabular and graphical methods of data visualization are used. The main scientific conclusion is that the system-forming principles of tax regulation of technological sovereignty are consistency and complexity. The principle of systematic taxation assumes that the interaction between the elements of the ecosystem of technological development is no less important than these elements themselves. The principle of complexity is responsible for the level of complexity and diversity of the system of tax regulation of technological sovereignty and tax instruments. The systematic nature of tax regulation is manifested in several aspects: 1) the multiplicative (emergent) nature of the influence of tax instruments; 2) the presence of distorting effects of tax regulation of technological ecosystems; 3) taking into account the relationship between tax and other economic regulators of ensuring technological sovereignty. The principle of complexity assumes that tax incentives for ecosystems of technological development should include functional, sectoral and territorial aspects.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditor
Published
2025-09-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12737/1998-0701-2025-11-9-23-30
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Principles of tax regulation of the ecosystem of technological development in the context of ensuring technological security of Russia

Auditor
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
article

Principles of tax regulation of the ecosystem of technological development in the context of ensuring technological security of Russia

article en

Abstract

The subject of the article is the principles of taxation and tax regulation of the provision of the ecosystem of technological development. The work considers the architecture of the ecosystem of technological development, provides its constituent elements of the relationship and functions of the constituent elements of the ecosystem. The main subjects (technology companies) and peripheral (other organizations, government, financial institutions, as well as academic and research organizations) are identified as elements of the ecosystem. The author's classification of types of tax support for ecosystems of technological development is given: functional, sectoral, territorial, cluster, zonal, subject-sectoral, point. The author characterized the interaction of fiscal and monetary policies, on the basis of which a conclusion was made about the advantage of fiscal policy (fiscal leadership regime) over monetary policy (monetary leadership regime). The study uses general scientific methods: abstraction, analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction. Among the specific scientific methods, tabular and graphical methods of data visualization are used. The main scientific conclusion is that the system-forming principles of tax regulation of technological sovereignty are consistency and complexity. The principle of systematic taxation assumes that the interaction between the elements of the ecosystem of technological development is no less important than these elements themselves. The principle of complexity is responsible for the level of complexity and diversity of the system of tax regulation of technological sovereignty and tax instruments. The systematic nature of tax regulation is manifested in several aspects: 1) the multiplicative (emergent) nature of the influence of tax instruments; 2) the presence of distorting effects of tax regulation of technological ecosystems; 3) taking into account the relationship between tax and other economic regulators of ensuring technological sovereignty. The principle of complexity assumes that tax incentives for ecosystems of technological development should include functional, sectoral and territorial aspects.

AuditorVol. 11(9)
Financial University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.