Addressing Loneliness in Psychosis: A Rapid Realist Review of Multi-Level Interventions

Abstract People living with psychosis experience disproportionately high levels of loneliness, yet there is currently a lack of interventions specifically tailored to their needs. Existing approaches often focus on individual-level change, overlooking the broader social, interpersonal, and structural factors that compound disconnection. Given the complex and intersecting drivers of loneliness in this population-including stigma, marginalisation, and reduced access to meaningful social roles-a more nuanced understanding is essential to inform effective support. We conducted a rapid realist review to explore how, why, and in what contexts interventions may reduce loneliness in people with psychosis. The review synthesises findings from 65 peer-reviewed papers and is enriched by consultations with academic experts and lived experience advisors. Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations were developed to build a theory-driven framework of effective intervention strategies. The review identified a broad range of potential intervention targets at the individual (e.g. self-esteem, internalised stigma), interpersonal (e.g. relationship quality), community (e.g. social integration), and structural (e.g. housing) levels. For each, we suggest possible intervention strategies grounded in theory and evidence. Findings highlight the importance of intersectionality and support the development of personalised, co-produced, and multi-level approaches that are responsive to the lived realities of people with psychosis. This work will inform the design of intervention and public health strategies to reduce loneliness and promote inclusion in this underserved group. Key messages • There is currently a lack of loneliness interventions tailored for people with psychosis; we identify what works, for whom, and in what contexts. • Reducing loneliness in psychosis requires multi-level responses that address stigma, exclusion, and structural inequality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1939
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Addressing Loneliness in Psychosis: A Rapid Realist Review of Multi-Level Interventions

European Journal of Public Health
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

Addressing Loneliness in Psychosis: A Rapid Realist Review of Multi-Level Interventions

article en

Abstract

Abstract People living with psychosis experience disproportionately high levels of loneliness, yet there is currently a lack of interventions specifically tailored to their needs. Existing approaches often focus on individual-level change, overlooking the broader social, interpersonal, and structural factors that compound disconnection. Given the complex and intersecting drivers of loneliness in this population-including stigma, marginalisation, and reduced access to meaningful social roles-a more nuanced understanding is essential to inform effective support. We conducted a rapid realist review to explore how, why, and in what contexts interventions may reduce loneliness in people with psychosis. The review synthesises findings from 65 peer-reviewed papers and is enriched by consultations with academic experts and lived experience advisors. Context-Mechanism-Outcome (CMO) configurations were developed to build a theory-driven framework of effective intervention strategies. The review identified a broad range of potential intervention targets at the individual (e.g. self-esteem, internalised stigma), interpersonal (e.g. relationship quality), community (e.g. social integration), and structural (e.g. housing) levels. For each, we suggest possible intervention strategies grounded in theory and evidence. Findings highlight the importance of intersectionality and support the development of personalised, co-produced, and multi-level approaches that are responsive to the lived realities of people with psychosis. This work will inform the design of intervention and public health strategies to reduce loneliness and promote inclusion in this underserved group. Key messages • There is currently a lack of loneliness interventions tailored for people with psychosis; we identify what works, for whom, and in what contexts. • Reducing loneliness in psychosis requires multi-level responses that address stigma, exclusion, and structural inequality.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
The London College (GB), University College London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.