New multisectoral approach to disentangle supply inequalities in mental health service ecosystems

Abstract Introduction Need for accessible, efficient, well-integrated and equitable mental health (MH) services is constantly growing. In Europe, 1/6 people live with ill MH impacting also the informal, educational, employment and justice sectors. Nevertheless, no multisectoral assessment of supply-related inequalities in an existing MH service ecosystem has been performed yet. Methods We comprehensively assessed all multi-sectoral human services for MH in Vienna. Services and required meta-data were identified through extensive literature, document, web and professional organisation list searches, expert consultations and provider surveys (Sept 2023-May 2025). Supply-related inequalities were mapped and synthesized by sector, target group, service activity, and supply area based on a new, modified, international classification of human services (DESDE), and visualized for policy interpretations. Results We identified 384 micro-level organisations that provide MH-related services in Vienna. While 75% operate in health and social care, only comparatively few services are available in the informal (13%), education (5%), justice (5%) and employment (1%) sectors. Child&adolescent services are <20%. Most services are consultation-based, while others are 9% residential, 13% day, 13% self-help, 12% information/evaluation and <2% access oriented. We further extracted and mapped 6,916 individual professional outpatient services (99% health and social). Population-adjusted density of services differ 7-fold for organisational and 11-fold for individual services across main supply regions. Conclusions This first multisectoral assessment of supply-related MH service ecosystem inequalities indicate major distributional imbalances across sectors, target groups, care segments and supply areas. Comparative supply-demand assessment against population-level MH-related administrative hospitalisation and medication data is ongoing for refined policy and planning recommendations. Key messages • New multisectoral mapping allows disentangling complex supply-related inequalities in MH service ecosystems. • Future MH service planning should focus both on reduced distributional imbalances and improved integration.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.867
Primary Topic
Mental Health Treatment and Access
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

New multisectoral approach to disentangle supply inequalities in mental health service ecosystems

European Journal of Public Health
Mental Health Treatment and Access
article

New multisectoral approach to disentangle supply inequalities in mental health service ecosystems

article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Need for accessible, efficient, well-integrated and equitable mental health (MH) services is constantly growing. In Europe, 1/6 people live with ill MH impacting also the informal, educational, employment and justice sectors. Nevertheless, no multisectoral assessment of supply-related inequalities in an existing MH service ecosystem has been performed yet. Methods We comprehensively assessed all multi-sectoral human services for MH in Vienna. Services and required meta-data were identified through extensive literature, document, web and professional organisation list searches, expert consultations and provider surveys (Sept 2023-May 2025). Supply-related inequalities were mapped and synthesized by sector, target group, service activity, and supply area based on a new, modified, international classification of human services (DESDE), and visualized for policy interpretations. Results We identified 384 micro-level organisations that provide MH-related services in Vienna. While 75% operate in health and social care, only comparatively few services are available in the informal (13%), education (5%), justice (5%) and employment (1%) sectors. Child&adolescent services are <20%. Most services are consultation-based, while others are 9% residential, 13% day, 13% self-help, 12% information/evaluation and <2% access oriented. We further extracted and mapped 6,916 individual professional outpatient services (99% health and social). Population-adjusted density of services differ 7-fold for organisational and 11-fold for individual services across main supply regions. Conclusions This first multisectoral assessment of supply-related MH service ecosystem inequalities indicate major distributional imbalances across sectors, target groups, care segments and supply areas. Comparative supply-demand assessment against population-level MH-related administrative hospitalisation and medication data is ongoing for refined policy and planning recommendations. Key messages • New multisectoral mapping allows disentangling complex supply-related inequalities in MH service ecosystems. • Future MH service planning should focus both on reduced distributional imbalances and improved integration.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University of Oxford (GB), Austrian Institute for Health Technology Assessment GmbH (AT), Universidad Loyola (BO), Public Health Institute (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Mental Health Treatment and Access
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.