Who can wait? Differences in academic delay of gratification and executive function in self-identifying neurodivergent and neurotypical psychology students

Academic Delay of Gratification (ADOG) is essential for academic success, but its effectiveness among neurodivergent students compared to neurotypical peers remains underexplored. This study examined 82 first-year psychology students in the UK, comparing 41 individuals who self-identified as neurodivergent, with 41 neurotypical peers, matched by age, gender and general anxiety levels. Participants completed assessments of ADOG and executive functions (EFs): inhibition, emotional regulation, and planning/organisation. Contrary to expectations, self-identifying neurodivergent students demonstrated stronger ADOG abilities than their neurotypical counterparts, although this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, group membership was the only significant predictor of ADOG performance, even when EFs were controlled for. These findings suggest that lower academic achievement among self-identifying neurodivergent students cannot be attributed solely to difficulties in delaying immediate gratification for future academic goals.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Teaching Review
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsptr.2025.31.2.6
Primary Topic
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who can wait? Differences in academic delay of gratification and executive function in self-identifying neurodivergent and neurotypical psychology students

Psychology Teaching Review
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
article

Who can wait? Differences in academic delay of gratification and executive function in self-identifying neurodivergent and neurotypical psychology students

article en

Abstract

Academic Delay of Gratification (ADOG) is essential for academic success, but its effectiveness among neurodivergent students compared to neurotypical peers remains underexplored. This study examined 82 first-year psychology students in the UK, comparing 41 individuals who self-identified as neurodivergent, with 41 neurotypical peers, matched by age, gender and general anxiety levels. Participants completed assessments of ADOG and executive functions (EFs): inhibition, emotional regulation, and planning/organisation. Contrary to expectations, self-identifying neurodivergent students demonstrated stronger ADOG abilities than their neurotypical counterparts, although this difference was not statistically significant. Furthermore, group membership was the only significant predictor of ADOG performance, even when EFs were controlled for. These findings suggest that lower academic achievement among self-identifying neurodivergent students cannot be attributed solely to difficulties in delaying immediate gratification for future academic goals.

Psychology Teaching ReviewVol. 31(2)
Queen's University Belfast (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.