Systematic review & meta-analysis of interventions targeting gut colonisation by MDRO, 2025

Abstract Background Gut colonisation with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) increases risks of infection, transmission and mortality in healthcare settings. Although decolonisation strategies have been attempted to reduce the impact of gut MDRO, no consensus exists on their effectiveness. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of these strategies. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Web of Science for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from Jan 2005 to Dec 2024. MDRO were defined as ESBL-E, CRE, VRE and MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria, excluding C. difficile and MRSA. Eligible studies included adults or children in healthcare settings, with baseline MDRO colonisation confirmed by rectal swab or stool sample. The primary outcome was reduction in colonisation rates in the short term (<4 weeks) and long term (≥4 weeks). A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. PROSPERO: CRD42025625291. Results Of 900 studies screened, 14 RCTs met inclusion criteria - seven evaluated probiotics, six assessed oral non-absorbable antibiotics, and one examined a combination of antibiotics with faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Most were hospital-based (n = 13), with one in a long-term care facility. Meta-analysis of all studies showed no significant impact on short-term (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.32) or long-term decolonisation rates (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.95-1.33). Subgroup analysis showed no effect of probiotics or antibiotics alone although antibiotics showed a trend towards benefit for long-term decolonisation (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.48). Risk of bias was low in four studies, with seven having some concerns and three at high risk. Conclusions Current evidence does not show a significant effect of intervention on short- or long-term gut MDRO decolonisation. Further trials are needed to evaluate promising strategies, including FMT and antibiotics. Key messages • Current evidence shows no significant short- or long-term benefit of interventions for gut MDRO decolonisation. • More robust trials are needed to identify sustained decolonisation strategies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.980
Primary Topic
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review & meta-analysis of interventions targeting gut colonisation by MDRO, 2025

European Journal of Public Health
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
article

Systematic review & meta-analysis of interventions targeting gut colonisation by MDRO, 2025

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Gut colonisation with multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) increases risks of infection, transmission and mortality in healthcare settings. Although decolonisation strategies have been attempted to reduce the impact of gut MDRO, no consensus exists on their effectiveness. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of these strategies. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL and Web of Science for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from Jan 2005 to Dec 2024. MDRO were defined as ESBL-E, CRE, VRE and MDR/XDR Gram-negative bacteria, excluding C. difficile and MRSA. Eligible studies included adults or children in healthcare settings, with baseline MDRO colonisation confirmed by rectal swab or stool sample. The primary outcome was reduction in colonisation rates in the short term (<4 weeks) and long term (≥4 weeks). A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed bias using the Cochrane RoB2 tool. PROSPERO: CRD42025625291. Results Of 900 studies screened, 14 RCTs met inclusion criteria - seven evaluated probiotics, six assessed oral non-absorbable antibiotics, and one examined a combination of antibiotics with faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Most were hospital-based (n = 13), with one in a long-term care facility. Meta-analysis of all studies showed no significant impact on short-term (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82-1.32) or long-term decolonisation rates (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.95-1.33). Subgroup analysis showed no effect of probiotics or antibiotics alone although antibiotics showed a trend towards benefit for long-term decolonisation (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.99-1.48). Risk of bias was low in four studies, with seven having some concerns and three at high risk. Conclusions Current evidence does not show a significant effect of intervention on short- or long-term gut MDRO decolonisation. Further trials are needed to evaluate promising strategies, including FMT and antibiotics. Key messages • Current evidence shows no significant short- or long-term benefit of interventions for gut MDRO decolonisation. • More robust trials are needed to identify sustained decolonisation strategies.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
National University of Singapore (SG), Singapore General Hospital (SG), National University Health System (SG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.