Collective dynamics of health (mis)information contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract Background The spread of health misinformation through social media has become a major public health problem. Although there is a broad consensus among health professionals, researchers and policy makers on the need to control health disinformation, there is still little evidence on the effects that misinformation contagion could have on public health strategies. The present study aims to characterize COVID-19 infodemic and its impact on social and health decision-making processes. Methods The present study follows a mixed methods approach combining survey data, social media mining techniques, and agent-based models (ABM) to analyze the processes of health misinformation diffusion from different simulated scenarios. Results The analysis of a massive dataset obtained from Twitter during the first months of the pandemic reveal a high politicization of health issues, which would result in clear divisions around fundamental issues for the control of the health crisis such as, for example, the need for vaccines or the follow-up of preventive measures. In addition, social bots were identified as a source of disinformation that favors the dissemination of false or misleading content, while contributing to increase social polarization (e.g., among extreme right-wing ideology and low-SES individuals). From the ABM, significant differences were detected in the impact of the relevance/centrality of the agents and the topology of the networks in relation to specific topics. Specifically, in relation to the topic of vaccines, high reciprocity was observed among members of the anti-vaccine community, which points to the difficulty of combating misinformation and carrying out health promotion interventions in this group. Conclusions Our findings show that the impact of health misinformation can vary considerably depending on the sources of misinformation, the topology of the network and the topics on which debates are articulated. Key messages • The spread of health misinformation on social media is a major public health issue, influencing social and health decisions, with little evidence on its long-term effects. • COVID-19 misinformation is highly politicized, with social bots amplifying polarization, especially among right-wing and low-SES individuals, making health interventions more challenging.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1109
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective dynamics of health (mis)information contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic

European Journal of Public Health
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

Collective dynamics of health (mis)information contagion during the COVID-19 pandemic

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The spread of health misinformation through social media has become a major public health problem. Although there is a broad consensus among health professionals, researchers and policy makers on the need to control health disinformation, there is still little evidence on the effects that misinformation contagion could have on public health strategies. The present study aims to characterize COVID-19 infodemic and its impact on social and health decision-making processes. Methods The present study follows a mixed methods approach combining survey data, social media mining techniques, and agent-based models (ABM) to analyze the processes of health misinformation diffusion from different simulated scenarios. Results The analysis of a massive dataset obtained from Twitter during the first months of the pandemic reveal a high politicization of health issues, which would result in clear divisions around fundamental issues for the control of the health crisis such as, for example, the need for vaccines or the follow-up of preventive measures. In addition, social bots were identified as a source of disinformation that favors the dissemination of false or misleading content, while contributing to increase social polarization (e.g., among extreme right-wing ideology and low-SES individuals). From the ABM, significant differences were detected in the impact of the relevance/centrality of the agents and the topology of the networks in relation to specific topics. Specifically, in relation to the topic of vaccines, high reciprocity was observed among members of the anti-vaccine community, which points to the difficulty of combating misinformation and carrying out health promotion interventions in this group. Conclusions Our findings show that the impact of health misinformation can vary considerably depending on the sources of misinformation, the topology of the network and the topics on which debates are articulated. Key messages • The spread of health misinformation on social media is a major public health issue, influencing social and health decisions, with little evidence on its long-term effects. • COVID-19 misinformation is highly politicized, with social bots amplifying polarization, especially among right-wing and low-SES individuals, making health interventions more challenging.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Universidad de La Frontera (CL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.