Curriculum justice: Redistributing, recognition and representation through the inclusion of Indigenous ways of knowing in a national curriculum

Abstract In this paper, we present an analysis of the Foundation to Year 10 Australian Curriculum in relation to its adequacy as a tool to support the provision of curriculum justice. We identify how Indigenous mandated content is dispersed across disciplinary structures unevenly, and provide insights into how this enables certain ways for teachers and students to understand Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Indigenous content is included in the Australian curriculum in the form of cross curriculum content, fragmented and then deployed only to provide context for disciplinary content and outcomes. In this paper, we consider Fraser's three‐dimensional frame for social justice to interrogate the response of consecutive governments to the inequitable education provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. We then accept the policy logic to look at what the curriculum offers in regard to Indigenous content and the representations offered to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students and their non‐Indigenous peers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Curriculum Journal
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/curj.70001
Primary Topic
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curriculum justice: Redistributing, recognition and representation through the inclusion of Indigenous ways of knowing in a national curriculum

The Curriculum Journal
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
article

Curriculum justice: Redistributing, recognition and representation through the inclusion of Indigenous ways of knowing in a national curriculum

article en

Abstract

Abstract In this paper, we present an analysis of the Foundation to Year 10 Australian Curriculum in relation to its adequacy as a tool to support the provision of curriculum justice. We identify how Indigenous mandated content is dispersed across disciplinary structures unevenly, and provide insights into how this enables certain ways for teachers and students to understand Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Indigenous content is included in the Australian curriculum in the form of cross curriculum content, fragmented and then deployed only to provide context for disciplinary content and outcomes. In this paper, we consider Fraser's three‐dimensional frame for social justice to interrogate the response of consecutive governments to the inequitable education provided to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students. We then accept the policy logic to look at what the curriculum offers in regard to Indigenous content and the representations offered to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students and their non‐Indigenous peers.

The Curriculum JournalVol. 37(1)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Curriculum justice: Redistributing, recognition and representation through the inclusion of Indigenous ways of knowing in a national curriculum · The Curriculum Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS