Combination Immunotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most treatment-resistant malignancies, with limited survival benefits achieved using standard therapies. Immunotherapy has transformed treatment in several cancers, yet its clinical efficacy in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain, particularly in the context of combination regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of combination immunotherapy on survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer and identified study-level factors contributing to variability in effect sizes. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Epistemonikos through March 2025. Eligible studies included clinical trials reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in pancreatic cancer treated with combination immunotherapy. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the REML estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Moderator analyses and publication bias assessments were also conducted. Results Eleven trials met inclusion criteria. After excluding three outliers, the pooled HR for OS indicated a significant survival benefit for combination immunotherapy (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.90, p < 0.001), with no residual heterogeneity (I² = 0%). PFS analysis showed high heterogeneity (I² = 95.5%) and no significant pooled effect (HR = 2.87, 95% CI: 0.92-8.92). Trial phase emerged as a significant moderator, with later-phase trials showing more favorable outcomes. Funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's test suggested potential publication bias, though adjusted estimates remained robust. Conclusions Combination immunotherapy shows promise in improving overall survival in pancreatic cancer, particularly in later-phase trials. However, variability in PFS outcomes and limited biomarker data underscore the need for biomarker-driven trials and standardized reporting. Key messages • Combination immunotherapy significantly improves overall survival in pancreatic cancer, particularly in later-phase trials, highlighting its promise as a strategy for this treatment-resistant disease. • High variability in PFS outcomes and limited biomarker data underscore the need for biomarker-driven trials and standardized reporting to improve treatment precision and patient selection.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1257
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combination Immunotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

European Journal of Public Health
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Combination Immunotherapy for Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most treatment-resistant malignancies, with limited survival benefits achieved using standard therapies. Immunotherapy has transformed treatment in several cancers, yet its clinical efficacy in pancreatic cancer remains uncertain, particularly in the context of combination regimens. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of combination immunotherapy on survival outcomes in pancreatic cancer and identified study-level factors contributing to variability in effect sizes. Methods A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Epistemonikos through March 2025. Eligible studies included clinical trials reporting hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) in pancreatic cancer treated with combination immunotherapy. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the REML estimator with Hartung-Knapp adjustment. Moderator analyses and publication bias assessments were also conducted. Results Eleven trials met inclusion criteria. After excluding three outliers, the pooled HR for OS indicated a significant survival benefit for combination immunotherapy (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66-0.90, p < 0.001), with no residual heterogeneity (I² = 0%). PFS analysis showed high heterogeneity (I² = 95.5%) and no significant pooled effect (HR = 2.87, 95% CI: 0.92-8.92). Trial phase emerged as a significant moderator, with later-phase trials showing more favorable outcomes. Funnel plot asymmetry and Egger's test suggested potential publication bias, though adjusted estimates remained robust. Conclusions Combination immunotherapy shows promise in improving overall survival in pancreatic cancer, particularly in later-phase trials. However, variability in PFS outcomes and limited biomarker data underscore the need for biomarker-driven trials and standardized reporting. Key messages • Combination immunotherapy significantly improves overall survival in pancreatic cancer, particularly in later-phase trials, highlighting its promise as a strategy for this treatment-resistant disease. • High variability in PFS outcomes and limited biomarker data underscore the need for biomarker-driven trials and standardized reporting to improve treatment precision and patient selection.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Texas A&M University System (US), Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.