Systematic review of human living libraries mapped to the social determinants of health

Abstract Background Human living libraries (HLL) promote engagement with individuals representing societal groups often facing prejudice or discrimination. Over the past two decades, the concept of HLLS has expanded in healthcare literature. HLLs aim to provide a mechanism that challenges stereotypes and reduces stigma, facilitating one-to-one conversations between a human book and a reader. This review seeks to understand the impact of HLLS, focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Methods Systematic searches [2000-2024] were conducted across 10 databases [ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, LISA, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science]. No restrictions on language or study design were applied. Google Translate and DeepL facilitated the translation of non-English papers. A total of 541 records were identified, and 281 records were uploaded to Covidence after deduplication. Robust review methods were adopted for screening, quality assessment (using Mixed Methods Assessment Tool), equity mapping (using Progress Plus framework) and narrative synthesis. Results Preliminary data from 27 studies (31 records) includes 12 countries: Canada (6/27), USA (5/27), Spain, China, Hong Kong, Russia, the Philippines, Poland, UK, Hungary, Turkey, and Taiwan. Most HLLs were developed in university settings, public libraries, art galleries, and secondary schools. Eight studies (29.6%) report HLL development as part of curriculum development, and one study presents HLL as supporting global students adapting to a new university setting, learning social norms, and supporting engagement. 70.4% (18/27) of studies align with the Progress Plus framework, highlighting diversity and inclusion across specified occupations, genders, religions, languages, cultures, education, and broader diversity. Conclusions Preliminary findings emphasise the inclusivity of HLLs and building capacity for public health education and research that align with social determinants of health. Key messages • Human Living Libraries offer creative mechanisms using human books that support real-world social inclusion and diversity conversations globally. • Human Living Library development requires co-designed development [virtual, in-person events or in curricula developments] to ensure culturally sensitive approaches and limiting of tokenism.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.010
Primary Topic
Biological Control of Invasive Species
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review of human living libraries mapped to the social determinants of health

European Journal of Public Health
Biological Control of Invasive Species
article

Systematic review of human living libraries mapped to the social determinants of health

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Human living libraries (HLL) promote engagement with individuals representing societal groups often facing prejudice or discrimination. Over the past two decades, the concept of HLLS has expanded in healthcare literature. HLLs aim to provide a mechanism that challenges stereotypes and reduces stigma, facilitating one-to-one conversations between a human book and a reader. This review seeks to understand the impact of HLLS, focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion. Methods Systematic searches [2000-2024] were conducted across 10 databases [ASSIA, CINAHL, Embase, ERIC, LISA, PsycINFO, PubMed, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science]. No restrictions on language or study design were applied. Google Translate and DeepL facilitated the translation of non-English papers. A total of 541 records were identified, and 281 records were uploaded to Covidence after deduplication. Robust review methods were adopted for screening, quality assessment (using Mixed Methods Assessment Tool), equity mapping (using Progress Plus framework) and narrative synthesis. Results Preliminary data from 27 studies (31 records) includes 12 countries: Canada (6/27), USA (5/27), Spain, China, Hong Kong, Russia, the Philippines, Poland, UK, Hungary, Turkey, and Taiwan. Most HLLs were developed in university settings, public libraries, art galleries, and secondary schools. Eight studies (29.6%) report HLL development as part of curriculum development, and one study presents HLL as supporting global students adapting to a new university setting, learning social norms, and supporting engagement. 70.4% (18/27) of studies align with the Progress Plus framework, highlighting diversity and inclusion across specified occupations, genders, religions, languages, cultures, education, and broader diversity. Conclusions Preliminary findings emphasise the inclusivity of HLLs and building capacity for public health education and research that align with social determinants of health. Key messages • Human Living Libraries offer creative mechanisms using human books that support real-world social inclusion and diversity conversations globally. • Human Living Library development requires co-designed development [virtual, in-person events or in curricula developments] to ensure culturally sensitive approaches and limiting of tokenism.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University College Dublin (IE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Biological Control of Invasive Species
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.