F1 Versus Indy: Analyzing a Unique Shared-Course Natural Experiment to Determine the World’s Fastest Auto Racing Format

This study utilizes a unique shared-course environment to compare the average speeds of the world’s two fastest auto racing formats, Formula One (F1) and IndyCar. These two racing circuits are distinct in terms of their places of origin, where in the world they typically source drivers and hold races, and the locations of their respective fan bases. Though F1 and IndyCar, cars share several common physical characteristics, their engines, chassis, tires, steering, and aerodynamics are distinct. While these two formats are commonly recognized as the two fastest forms of full-course auto-racing, the relative average speed capabilities of the two formats (e.g., over a neutral course) are unclear, as they have historically held official events on different sets of courses. In 2019, however, at the Circuit of the Americas in Austin, TX, F1 and IndyCar both held races over the same course, allowing for a natural experimental comparison in which year (state of technology), course, and even general weather conditions were common across the two races. By modeling qualifying times conditional on driver, race format, and other car characteristics, we statistically compare the relative average speeds of the two formats over the same course. In a set of fixed and mixed effects linear and polynomial regression models, we find that F1 was significantly and substantially faster than IndyCar. Average speed difference between the two formats was approximately 16.5 miles per hour over the course. These results inform not only race speed supremacy but returns to technological investment in the private sector.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Behavioral Scientist
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642251366044
Primary Topic
Sports Analytics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

F1 Versus Indy: Analyzing a Unique Shared-Course Natural Experiment to Determine the World’s Fastest Auto Racing Format

American Behavioral Scientist
Sports Analytics and Performance
article

F1 Versus Indy: Analyzing a Unique Shared-Course Natural Experiment to Determine the World’s Fastest Auto Racing Format

article en

Abstract

This study utilizes a unique shared-course environment to compare the average speeds of the world’s two fastest auto racing formats, Formula One (F1) and IndyCar. These two racing circuits are distinct in terms of their places of origin, where in the world they typically source drivers and hold races, and the locations of their respective fan bases. Though F1 and IndyCar, cars share several common physical characteristics, their engines, chassis, tires, steering, and aerodynamics are distinct. While these two formats are commonly recognized as the two fastest forms of full-course auto-racing, the relative average speed capabilities of the two formats (e.g., over a neutral course) are unclear, as they have historically held official events on different sets of courses. In 2019, however, at the Circuit of the Americas in Austin, TX, F1 and IndyCar both held races over the same course, allowing for a natural experimental comparison in which year (state of technology), course, and even general weather conditions were common across the two races. By modeling qualifying times conditional on driver, race format, and other car characteristics, we statistically compare the relative average speeds of the two formats over the same course. In a set of fixed and mixed effects linear and polynomial regression models, we find that F1 was significantly and substantially faster than IndyCar. Average speed difference between the two formats was approximately 16.5 miles per hour over the course. These results inform not only race speed supremacy but returns to technological investment in the private sector.

American Behavioral Scientist
Binghamton University (US), Princeton University (US), Syracuse University (US), University of North Georgia (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Sports Analytics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.