Individual determinants of residential mobility over a 20-year follow-up period (EGEA study)

Abstract Background Residential self-selection bias, which may result from demographic, socioeconomic or health-related characteristics predicting neighborhood “choice”, is a methodological issue in environmental health studies but has been rarely investigated. The objective is to identify individual determinants of residential moving among adults. Methods The study is based on the Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environment of Asthma (EGEA), a French multi-center cohort recruiting in early 90's a group of asthma cases, their first-degree relatives and a group from general population. Overall, 753 EGEA participants aged ≥25 years old at inclusion and who provided their residential history since 1990, through a self-reported questionnaire completed about 20 years later (2011-2013) were included in the present study. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate the associations of baseline demographic characteristics (age categories, sex, marital and family status) and socioeconomic factors (educational level, occupational status), housing type (multiple/single dwelling), and asthma status, with the probability of residential moving (yes/no) between 1990 and response to the residential history questionnaire. Results Study population was 55% female, 44±10 years old in average; 51% moved during the study period(1.4±1.8 moves in average). Compared to non-movers, movers were significantly (p < 0,05) more likely to be younger, single, to live in multiple-unit dwellings and to have higher education level but lower occupational status. Sex, family and asthma status were equally distributed across movers and non-movers. Conclusions In our 20-year follow-up study, some demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were associated with residential moving behaviors. Further analyses will be conducted to evaluate if residential moving of EGEA participants result in differential environmental exposures, which may contribute to social inequalities in health. Key messages • Residential moving is not a random process and is associated with sociodemographic factors. • Studying determinants of residential mobility is essential to account for residential self-selection bias.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1335
Primary Topic
Urban Green Space and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual determinants of residential mobility over a 20-year follow-up period (EGEA study)

European Journal of Public Health
Urban Green Space and Health
article

Individual determinants of residential mobility over a 20-year follow-up period (EGEA study)

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Residential self-selection bias, which may result from demographic, socioeconomic or health-related characteristics predicting neighborhood “choice”, is a methodological issue in environmental health studies but has been rarely investigated. The objective is to identify individual determinants of residential moving among adults. Methods The study is based on the Epidemiological study on the Genetics and Environment of Asthma (EGEA), a French multi-center cohort recruiting in early 90's a group of asthma cases, their first-degree relatives and a group from general population. Overall, 753 EGEA participants aged ≥25 years old at inclusion and who provided their residential history since 1990, through a self-reported questionnaire completed about 20 years later (2011-2013) were included in the present study. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate the associations of baseline demographic characteristics (age categories, sex, marital and family status) and socioeconomic factors (educational level, occupational status), housing type (multiple/single dwelling), and asthma status, with the probability of residential moving (yes/no) between 1990 and response to the residential history questionnaire. Results Study population was 55% female, 44±10 years old in average; 51% moved during the study period(1.4±1.8 moves in average). Compared to non-movers, movers were significantly (p < 0,05) more likely to be younger, single, to live in multiple-unit dwellings and to have higher education level but lower occupational status. Sex, family and asthma status were equally distributed across movers and non-movers. Conclusions In our 20-year follow-up study, some demographic and socioeconomic characteristics were associated with residential moving behaviors. Further analyses will be conducted to evaluate if residential moving of EGEA participants result in differential environmental exposures, which may contribute to social inequalities in health. Key messages • Residential moving is not a random process and is associated with sociodemographic factors. • Studying determinants of residential mobility is essential to account for residential self-selection bias.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (FR), Mutuelle Générale de l'Éducation Nationale (FR), Institut de Recherche sur le Cancer et le Vieillissement de Nice (FR), Gazi Hastanesi (TR), Barcelona Institute for Global Health (ES), Institut pour l'avancée des biosciences (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR), Université de Caen Normandie (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Urban Green Space and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.