Rethinking Obesity Classification: Population-Level Insights from a Small Island States

Abstract Background Traditional measures such as BMI are commonly used to define obesity, but they may not capture the complexity of obesity-related risk. This study applied newly proposed definitions of pre-obesity and clinical obesity by the Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Commission and compared them with standard anthropometric measures in Malta-a population with a high prevalence of obesity. Methods A nationally representative, cross-sectional health examination survey was conducted in Malta between 2014 and 2016 (weighted N = 3,947). Anthropometric, sociodemographic, behavioural, and biochemical data were collected. Obesity was assessed using BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), and the newly proposed definitions. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was used as a clinical complication. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine associations with MetS, adjusting for age, sex, education, and locality. Results Obesity prevalence varied by classification: 34.08% (BMI), 34.81% (WC), 68.94% (WHR), 39.17% (WtHR), and 22.40% (clinical obesity). All anthropometric measures showed significant associations with MetS, even after adjustment. Obesity defined by BMI had the strongest association (OR: 18.84, 95% CI: 14.13-25.13), while the newly defined clinical obesity also showed a strong association (OR: 9.89, 95% CI: 8.37-11.67). The pre-obesity category was negatively associated with MetS (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.12-0.22), supporting its distinction as a preclinical state. Conclusions Different anthropometric measures identify different subgroups within the population, yet all are significantly associated with MetS. The findings support the utility of the Lancet Commission's refined definitions, particularly the pre-obesity classification, in guiding early intervention strategies. Key messages • Applying multiple anthropometric measures reveals variation in obesity classification, but all remain significantly associated with metabolic complications, highlighting their clinical value. • The newly defined pre-obesity category shows a protective association with metabolic syndrome, supporting its use as a meaningful stage for early risk identification and intervention.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1177
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking Obesity Classification: Population-Level Insights from a Small Island States

European Journal of Public Health
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Rethinking Obesity Classification: Population-Level Insights from a Small Island States

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Traditional measures such as BMI are commonly used to define obesity, but they may not capture the complexity of obesity-related risk. This study applied newly proposed definitions of pre-obesity and clinical obesity by the Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology Commission and compared them with standard anthropometric measures in Malta-a population with a high prevalence of obesity. Methods A nationally representative, cross-sectional health examination survey was conducted in Malta between 2014 and 2016 (weighted N = 3,947). Anthropometric, sociodemographic, behavioural, and biochemical data were collected. Obesity was assessed using BMI, waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), and the newly proposed definitions. Metabolic syndrome (MetS) was used as a clinical complication. Binary logistic regression models were used to examine associations with MetS, adjusting for age, sex, education, and locality. Results Obesity prevalence varied by classification: 34.08% (BMI), 34.81% (WC), 68.94% (WHR), 39.17% (WtHR), and 22.40% (clinical obesity). All anthropometric measures showed significant associations with MetS, even after adjustment. Obesity defined by BMI had the strongest association (OR: 18.84, 95% CI: 14.13-25.13), while the newly defined clinical obesity also showed a strong association (OR: 9.89, 95% CI: 8.37-11.67). The pre-obesity category was negatively associated with MetS (OR: 0.16, 95% CI: 0.12-0.22), supporting its distinction as a preclinical state. Conclusions Different anthropometric measures identify different subgroups within the population, yet all are significantly associated with MetS. The findings support the utility of the Lancet Commission's refined definitions, particularly the pre-obesity classification, in guiding early intervention strategies. Key messages • Applying multiple anthropometric measures reveals variation in obesity classification, but all remain significantly associated with metabolic complications, highlighting their clinical value. • The newly defined pre-obesity category shows a protective association with metabolic syndrome, supporting its use as a meaningful stage for early risk identification and intervention.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Western University (CA), University of Malta (MT), Mater Dei Hospital (MT), Mater Dei Hospital (BR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.