Psychosocial and contextual patient factors in RCTs for asthma and type 2 diabetes

Abstract Background Chronic conditions like asthma and type 2 diabetes remain major causes of morbidity and mortality, requiring sustained patient engagement. Health psychology shows that such engagement varies due to psychosocial and contextual factors. While clinicians often adapt care intuitively, these influences are under-reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Aim To identify and map psychosocial and contextual patient factors reported in RCTs for asthma and type 2 diabetes Methods A systematic MEDLINE (OVID) search identified English-language RCTs on adult asthma or type 2 diabetes, published from 01/01/2019. Fifty trials per condition were selected. Data on study design, participants, baseline and subgroup variables were extracted and categorised using a pre-existing framework Results Asthma: • 1,030 reports identified; 600 screened; 124 full texts reviewed; • 715 baseline items: 86.2% biological, 13.8% psychosocial/contextual; • 42 subgroup analyses: 76% biological, 24% psychosocial/contextual. Type 2 Diabetes: • 3,910 reports identified; 500 screened; 79 full texts reviewed; • 715 baseline items: 86.2% biological, 13.8% psychosocial/contextual; • 41 subgroup analyses: 76% biological, 24% psychosocial/contextual. Key Findings: Most reported variables were biological or clinical. Psychosocial and contextual factors were rarely assessed or analysed, despite their relevance to patient engagement Discussion The limited inclusion of psychosocial/contextual factors may reduce RCT generalisability and lead to less effective, less personalised care. Public Health Implications: • Personalisation: Supports more tailored, effective care; • Policy: Informs policies promoting broader factor inclusion; • Equity: Helps reduce disparities through inclusive strategies; • Research: Highlights need for tools to measure these factors. Conclusions Broader inclusion of psychosocial and contextual factors in RCTs is essential to improve generalisability, outcomes, and equity in chronic disease care. Key messages • Psychosocial factors are rarely assessed in RCTs, limiting generalisability and missing key influences on patient engagement and outcomes. • Including psychosocial factors in research can improve patient outcomes, support personalised care, and advance health equity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1243
Primary Topic
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychosocial and contextual patient factors in RCTs for asthma and type 2 diabetes

European Journal of Public Health
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
article

Psychosocial and contextual patient factors in RCTs for asthma and type 2 diabetes

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Chronic conditions like asthma and type 2 diabetes remain major causes of morbidity and mortality, requiring sustained patient engagement. Health psychology shows that such engagement varies due to psychosocial and contextual factors. While clinicians often adapt care intuitively, these influences are under-reported in randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Aim To identify and map psychosocial and contextual patient factors reported in RCTs for asthma and type 2 diabetes Methods A systematic MEDLINE (OVID) search identified English-language RCTs on adult asthma or type 2 diabetes, published from 01/01/2019. Fifty trials per condition were selected. Data on study design, participants, baseline and subgroup variables were extracted and categorised using a pre-existing framework Results Asthma: • 1,030 reports identified; 600 screened; 124 full texts reviewed; • 715 baseline items: 86.2% biological, 13.8% psychosocial/contextual; • 42 subgroup analyses: 76% biological, 24% psychosocial/contextual. Type 2 Diabetes: • 3,910 reports identified; 500 screened; 79 full texts reviewed; • 715 baseline items: 86.2% biological, 13.8% psychosocial/contextual; • 41 subgroup analyses: 76% biological, 24% psychosocial/contextual. Key Findings: Most reported variables were biological or clinical. Psychosocial and contextual factors were rarely assessed or analysed, despite their relevance to patient engagement Discussion The limited inclusion of psychosocial/contextual factors may reduce RCT generalisability and lead to less effective, less personalised care. Public Health Implications: • Personalisation: Supports more tailored, effective care; • Policy: Informs policies promoting broader factor inclusion; • Equity: Helps reduce disparities through inclusive strategies; • Research: Highlights need for tools to measure these factors. Conclusions Broader inclusion of psychosocial and contextual factors in RCTs is essential to improve generalisability, outcomes, and equity in chronic disease care. Key messages • Psychosocial factors are rarely assessed in RCTs, limiting generalisability and missing key influences on patient engagement and outcomes. • Including psychosocial factors in research can improve patient outcomes, support personalised care, and advance health equity.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.