Cancer screening uptake among migrant background populations: an umbrella review

Abstract Background Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with colorectal, breast, cervical, and prostate cancers being among the most common types. Uptake of prevention and early detection strategies varies between native and migrant background populations. While research on disparities in cancer screening uptake among migrant groups exist, many studies do not account for the heterogeneity of these populations, including differences between first- and second-generation migrants. This umbrella review evaluates evidence on cancer screening uptake across these four cancers and identifies barriers and facilitators influencing participation. Methods Reviews on cancer screening uptake and related factors in migrant populations were searched in PubMed and Google Scholar. All types of reviews were included. Evidence was synthesised by distinguishing two groups: first-generation migrants (those who experienced migration) and second-generation descendants (those born in the host country to migrant parents). Results Twenty reviews were included, representing 439 primary studies. Most primary studies lacked clear definitions of migrant populations and relied on non-random sampling methods. When migration background was considered, first-generation migrants had lower cancer screening uptake (e.g., 0-50% for colorectal cancer) than second-generation migrants (23-50%). Screening rates were generally higher in native populations (e.g., 38-86% for cervical cancer) compared to migrant populations (11-69%). Barriers included lower socioeconomic conditions, language, cultural beliefs, limited cancer knowledge and the complexity of the healthcare system. Conclusions Cancer screening rates are lower among migrant populations compared to natives, but second-generation descendants have higher uptake compared to their migrant parents. However, most reviews were based on studies with non-representative samples and limited distinction between migrant subgroups. Key messages • Second-generation descendant of migrants have higher cancer screening uptake than first-generation migrants. • To capture meaningful disparities, research should reflect the diversity of migrant background population - by origin, generation and ethnicity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1740
Primary Topic
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cancer screening uptake among migrant background populations: an umbrella review

European Journal of Public Health
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
article

Cancer screening uptake among migrant background populations: an umbrella review

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide, with colorectal, breast, cervical, and prostate cancers being among the most common types. Uptake of prevention and early detection strategies varies between native and migrant background populations. While research on disparities in cancer screening uptake among migrant groups exist, many studies do not account for the heterogeneity of these populations, including differences between first- and second-generation migrants. This umbrella review evaluates evidence on cancer screening uptake across these four cancers and identifies barriers and facilitators influencing participation. Methods Reviews on cancer screening uptake and related factors in migrant populations were searched in PubMed and Google Scholar. All types of reviews were included. Evidence was synthesised by distinguishing two groups: first-generation migrants (those who experienced migration) and second-generation descendants (those born in the host country to migrant parents). Results Twenty reviews were included, representing 439 primary studies. Most primary studies lacked clear definitions of migrant populations and relied on non-random sampling methods. When migration background was considered, first-generation migrants had lower cancer screening uptake (e.g., 0-50% for colorectal cancer) than second-generation migrants (23-50%). Screening rates were generally higher in native populations (e.g., 38-86% for cervical cancer) compared to migrant populations (11-69%). Barriers included lower socioeconomic conditions, language, cultural beliefs, limited cancer knowledge and the complexity of the healthcare system. Conclusions Cancer screening rates are lower among migrant populations compared to natives, but second-generation descendants have higher uptake compared to their migrant parents. However, most reviews were based on studies with non-representative samples and limited distinction between migrant subgroups. Key messages • Second-generation descendant of migrants have higher cancer screening uptake than first-generation migrants. • To capture meaningful disparities, research should reflect the diversity of migrant background population - by origin, generation and ethnicity.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University of Geneva (CH), University of Fribourg (CH), Ghent University (BE), Swiss School of Public Health (CH), McGill University (CA), Geneva College (US), University of Sheffield (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.