Implementation status of infection prevention and control measures in italian intensive care units

Abstract Background Implementing Infection, Prevention, and Control (IPC) measures is crucial in combating Healthcare-Associated Infections. The World Health Organization's Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) tool enables facility-level self-assessment of eight key IPC components. Intensive Care Units (ICUs) participating in the SPIN-UTI Project 2022-23 edition were invited to evaluate their IPC implementation status. Methods An online IPCAF tool was developed within the SPIN-UTI platform. For each of the 43 participating ICUs, a score was calculated for each key component (range 0-100) to obtain an overall score (range 0-800). According to the overall score, implementation levels were evaluated as Inadequate (≤200), Basic (201-400), Intermediate (401-600) or Advanced (≥601). A survey was administered to identify barriers to IPC adoption. Results The highest-scoring components were Guidelines (median 95; range 37.5-100), Physical Environment (90; 75-100), HAI Surveillance (80; 32.5-100) and Workload (80; 15-100). The lowest-scoring areas were Training (60; 3-100), Monitoring/Audit and Feedback (67.5; 30-100), Multimodal Strategies (75; 0-100) and IPC Program (75; 15-100). Overall scores ranged from 350 to 782.5 (median 610). Implementation level was classified Advanced for 22 ICUs (51.2%), Intermediate for 15 (34.9%), and Basic for 6 (13.9%). Of all potential barriers, the most frequently reported were insufficient resources and staff (73.8%) and inadequate financial support (66.7%). 92.9% of ICUs reported at least one barrier, with an average of 5 barriers (range 0-10) and a negative correlation with the overall score (p < 0.001). Conclusions The analysis showed good IPC implementation, but training, monitoring, and multimodal strategy adoption need improvement. Among the main barriers reported, there is a lack of resources and personnel that underlines the need for targeted investments and greater organizational support. Key messages • Good IPC implementation in participating ICUs, with 51.2% classified as ‘Advanced.’ Improvements needed in training, monitoring, and multimodal strategies. • Main barriers include lack of resources and personnel and insufficient financial support, suggesting the need for targeted investments and greater organizational support.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1624
Primary Topic
Intramuscular injections and effects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation status of infection prevention and control measures in italian intensive care units

European Journal of Public Health
Intramuscular injections and effects
article

Implementation status of infection prevention and control measures in italian intensive care units

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Implementing Infection, Prevention, and Control (IPC) measures is crucial in combating Healthcare-Associated Infections. The World Health Organization's Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) tool enables facility-level self-assessment of eight key IPC components. Intensive Care Units (ICUs) participating in the SPIN-UTI Project 2022-23 edition were invited to evaluate their IPC implementation status. Methods An online IPCAF tool was developed within the SPIN-UTI platform. For each of the 43 participating ICUs, a score was calculated for each key component (range 0-100) to obtain an overall score (range 0-800). According to the overall score, implementation levels were evaluated as Inadequate (≤200), Basic (201-400), Intermediate (401-600) or Advanced (≥601). A survey was administered to identify barriers to IPC adoption. Results The highest-scoring components were Guidelines (median 95; range 37.5-100), Physical Environment (90; 75-100), HAI Surveillance (80; 32.5-100) and Workload (80; 15-100). The lowest-scoring areas were Training (60; 3-100), Monitoring/Audit and Feedback (67.5; 30-100), Multimodal Strategies (75; 0-100) and IPC Program (75; 15-100). Overall scores ranged from 350 to 782.5 (median 610). Implementation level was classified Advanced for 22 ICUs (51.2%), Intermediate for 15 (34.9%), and Basic for 6 (13.9%). Of all potential barriers, the most frequently reported were insufficient resources and staff (73.8%) and inadequate financial support (66.7%). 92.9% of ICUs reported at least one barrier, with an average of 5 barriers (range 0-10) and a negative correlation with the overall score (p < 0.001). Conclusions The analysis showed good IPC implementation, but training, monitoring, and multimodal strategy adoption need improvement. Among the main barriers reported, there is a lack of resources and personnel that underlines the need for targeted investments and greater organizational support. Key messages • Good IPC implementation in participating ICUs, with 51.2% classified as ‘Advanced.’ Improvements needed in training, monitoring, and multimodal strategies. • Main barriers include lack of resources and personnel and insufficient financial support, suggesting the need for targeted investments and greater organizational support.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
University of Catania (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Intramuscular injections and effects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.