Comparing anthropometric measures for metabolic risk prediction: a stratified analysis

Abstract Background Body mass index (BMI) is widely used to assess adiposity, but alternative measures such as waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) may better predict metabolic risk. Given the heterogeneity of the evidence depending on the populations studied, this study proposes to compare the predictive power of these measures for different risk factors in different subgroups of different sexes, age groups and educational levels. Methods Data collected as part of the Belgian Health Examination Survey in 2018 were used. It consists of a cross-sectional representative sample of 1,183 Belgian adults who were examined using standardised anthropometric measurements, blood pressure and blood biomarkers. Weighted logistic regression was used to estimate risk prediction in the general population and in specific subgroups. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and compared using DeLong's test for correlated ROC curves. Results For hypertension, no overall differences were found in the predictive power of the measures. However, BMI performed significantly better in women (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75-0.82) and in adults aged 65 + (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.81). For diabetes and prediabetes, WHtR outperformed BMI and WC in the overall model (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84), with significant differences mainly in women and adults aged 40-65 years. For dyslipidaemia, no overall difference was observed, but WHtR showed better performance in subgroups, especially in women (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and in those aged 40-65 years. No differences were found between education groups for any metabolic risk. Conclusions WHtR is a stronger predictor of diabetes and performs better in key demographic subgroups, while BMI remains a useful indicator in women and older adults. These findings support the use of population-specific measures of adiposity to improve the identification of individuals at metabolic risk. Key messages • Anthropometric performance varies by sex and age; using uniform measures may overlook individuals at high risk. • Waist-to-height ratio outperforms body mass index in predicting diabetes, while body mass index remains a stronger predictor of hypertension in women and older adults.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.564
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing anthropometric measures for metabolic risk prediction: a stratified analysis

European Journal of Public Health
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Comparing anthropometric measures for metabolic risk prediction: a stratified analysis

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Body mass index (BMI) is widely used to assess adiposity, but alternative measures such as waist circumference (WC) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) may better predict metabolic risk. Given the heterogeneity of the evidence depending on the populations studied, this study proposes to compare the predictive power of these measures for different risk factors in different subgroups of different sexes, age groups and educational levels. Methods Data collected as part of the Belgian Health Examination Survey in 2018 were used. It consists of a cross-sectional representative sample of 1,183 Belgian adults who were examined using standardised anthropometric measurements, blood pressure and blood biomarkers. Weighted logistic regression was used to estimate risk prediction in the general population and in specific subgroups. Area under the curve (AUC) was calculated and compared using DeLong's test for correlated ROC curves. Results For hypertension, no overall differences were found in the predictive power of the measures. However, BMI performed significantly better in women (AUC = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.75-0.82) and in adults aged 65 + (AUC = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.67-0.81). For diabetes and prediabetes, WHtR outperformed BMI and WC in the overall model (AUC = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.77-0.84), with significant differences mainly in women and adults aged 40-65 years. For dyslipidaemia, no overall difference was observed, but WHtR showed better performance in subgroups, especially in women (AUC = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.80-0.88) and in those aged 40-65 years. No differences were found between education groups for any metabolic risk. Conclusions WHtR is a stronger predictor of diabetes and performs better in key demographic subgroups, while BMI remains a useful indicator in women and older adults. These findings support the use of population-specific measures of adiposity to improve the identification of individuals at metabolic risk. Key messages • Anthropometric performance varies by sex and age; using uniform measures may overlook individuals at high risk. • Waist-to-height ratio outperforms body mass index in predicting diabetes, while body mass index remains a stronger predictor of hypertension in women and older adults.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Sciensano (Belgium) (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.