Families of Kuramoto models and bounded symmetric domains

We define families of Kuramoto models related to bounded symmetric domains. The families include Lohe unitary and spherical models as special cases. Our approach is based on the construction proposed by Watanabe and Strogats. We replace the Poincare disc and its $$S^1$$ boundary with bounded symmetric domains and with its Bergman–Shilov boundaries. In Cartan’s classifications there are four classical domains of types I–IV. Here we consider the domains of types I, II, and III. For a fixed domain, there is a decreasing chain of components of Bergman–Shilov boundaries. This leads to the families of Kuramoto models that we describe here.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1134/s0040577925100071
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Families of Kuramoto models and bounded symmetric domains

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

Families of Kuramoto models and bounded symmetric domains

article en

Abstract

We define families of Kuramoto models related to bounded symmetric domains. The families include Lohe unitary and spherical models as special cases. Our approach is based on the construction proposed by Watanabe and Strogats. We replace the Poincare disc and its $$S^1$$ boundary with bounded symmetric domains and with its Bergman–Shilov boundaries. In Cartan’s classifications there are four classical domains of types I–IV. Here we consider the domains of types I, II, and III. For a fixed domain, there is a decreasing chain of components of Bergman–Shilov boundaries. This leads to the families of Kuramoto models that we describe here.

Theoretical and Mathematical PhysicsVol. 225(1)
Kurchatov Institute (RU), Institute for Information Transmission Problems (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.