Modelling epidemiological and economics processes – the case of cervical cancer

Abstract Background Mathematical models aid in predicting the epidemiological and economic consequences of interventions. While many diseases are clearly infectious or chronic, cervical cancer is a complex disease that is caused by human papillomavirus and its classification varies by disease stage, which complicates the model decision. As low screening coverage is a major barrier to reducing the incidence, especially in resource-limited regions, modelling possible interventions and assessing effectiveness is essential for better care. Methods This study analysed the applicability of different mathematical models for cervical cancer, focusing on epidemiological and economic processes. A scoping review, following PRISMA guidelines, identified models used in cervical cancer research, including screening, vaccination, and treatment interventions. Publications were screened for model type, rationale, and forecasting suitability.. Results Among 71 original articles retrieved, most papers used System Dynamics Models (23), followed by homogenous Markov models (15) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) (12). No studies have applied inhomogeneous Markov models. Scenario techniques and sensitivity analyses, including Monte Carlo simulations, were frequent. Advanced models were mainly used in high-income settings, except for DES. Most studies lacked justification for model selection, but publications using readily available models often omitted descriptions or rationales. Conclusions The Model choice depends on study goals, time horizon, and epidemic stage. Homogeneous Markov models suit short-term screening assessments, while system dynamics and inhomogeneous Markov models better capture long-term or lifetime modelling for screening evaluation. System Dynamics models are best suited for diseases like cervical cancer. Given the global burden and the lack of rationale in model selection, interdisciplinary collaboration is needed to enhance forecasting and cost-effectiveness. Key messages • The epidemiology and economics of cervical cancer are complex and require strategic simulations to assess the impact of interventions. • System Dynamics Models are best to model complex diseases, like cervical cancer.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1794
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Modelling epidemiological and economics processes – the case of cervical cancer

European Journal of Public Health
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Modelling epidemiological and economics processes – the case of cervical cancer

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Mathematical models aid in predicting the epidemiological and economic consequences of interventions. While many diseases are clearly infectious or chronic, cervical cancer is a complex disease that is caused by human papillomavirus and its classification varies by disease stage, which complicates the model decision. As low screening coverage is a major barrier to reducing the incidence, especially in resource-limited regions, modelling possible interventions and assessing effectiveness is essential for better care. Methods This study analysed the applicability of different mathematical models for cervical cancer, focusing on epidemiological and economic processes. A scoping review, following PRISMA guidelines, identified models used in cervical cancer research, including screening, vaccination, and treatment interventions. Publications were screened for model type, rationale, and forecasting suitability.. Results Among 71 original articles retrieved, most papers used System Dynamics Models (23), followed by homogenous Markov models (15) and Discrete-Event Simulation (DES) (12). No studies have applied inhomogeneous Markov models. Scenario techniques and sensitivity analyses, including Monte Carlo simulations, were frequent. Advanced models were mainly used in high-income settings, except for DES. Most studies lacked justification for model selection, but publications using readily available models often omitted descriptions or rationales. Conclusions The Model choice depends on study goals, time horizon, and epidemic stage. Homogeneous Markov models suit short-term screening assessments, while system dynamics and inhomogeneous Markov models better capture long-term or lifetime modelling for screening evaluation. System Dynamics models are best suited for diseases like cervical cancer. Given the global burden and the lack of rationale in model selection, interdisciplinary collaboration is needed to enhance forecasting and cost-effectiveness. Key messages • The epidemiology and economics of cervical cancer are complex and require strategic simulations to assess the impact of interventions. • System Dynamics Models are best to model complex diseases, like cervical cancer.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), Universität Greifswald (DE)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.