Cows, Pigs and People: Enhanced Intensity-Based Clustering of Isomorphous Multi- Crystal Datasets in the Presence of Subtle Variations

The high-throughput data collection capabilities of modern X-ray facilities are challenging data processing pipelines to keep pace, while also remaining accessible to non-expert users. Rigorous analysis of multi-crystal data is necessary to sort through the data deluge, and the problem of which datasets to merge becomes an interesting scientific question. Lattice non-isomorphism is a key issue which has been well addressed (and automated) though techniques such as unit cell clustering (Foadi et al., 2013). The effective separation of structurally isomorphous datasets with subtle differences (such as bound ligands, conformational changes or amino acid mutations), is a more challenging problem but has the promise to separate meaningfully different structures from crystal populations. Previous work has used the hierarchical clustering analysis of pairwise correlation coefficients to address this question (Matsuura et al., 2023), although the interpretation of the resulting dendrograms can be ambiguous and thus difficult to automate. Hierarchical clustering can also be heavily dependent on the choice of linkage method, and the analysis of pairwise correlation coefficients does not distinguish between random and systematic errors. Work by Diederichs (Diederichs, 2017), however, extends this intensity-based clustering method to distinguish the effects of random and systematic errors, providing a clearer separation of datasets. These methods have since been extended within dials.cosym and applied in xia2.multiplex, a pipeline for the automatic scaling and merging of multi-crystal data (Gildea et al., 2022, Gildea & Winter, 2018). These intensity-based clustering methods, however, were still missing the key element of automatic selection of relevant subsets of data, which is critical for analysing high-throughput data collections. In this presentation, clustering methods in dials.cosym and xia2.multipex are explored, showing the improved and automated methods to provide unambiguous separation of crystals of bovine, porcine and human insulin which have isomorphous lattices (Figure 1). Weighting of pairwise correlation coefficients, and the implementation of spatial density-based clustering algorithms enable such separation and are now available within the DIALS framework.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Structural Dynamics
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/4.0000877
Primary Topic
Classical Studies and Philology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cows, Pigs and People: Enhanced Intensity-Based Clustering of Isomorphous Multi- Crystal Datasets in the Presence of Subtle Variations

Structural Dynamics
Classical Studies and Philology
article

Cows, Pigs and People: Enhanced Intensity-Based Clustering of Isomorphous Multi- Crystal Datasets in the Presence of Subtle Variations

article en

Abstract

The high-throughput data collection capabilities of modern X-ray facilities are challenging data processing pipelines to keep pace, while also remaining accessible to non-expert users. Rigorous analysis of multi-crystal data is necessary to sort through the data deluge, and the problem of which datasets to merge becomes an interesting scientific question. Lattice non-isomorphism is a key issue which has been well addressed (and automated) though techniques such as unit cell clustering (Foadi et al., 2013). The effective separation of structurally isomorphous datasets with subtle differences (such as bound ligands, conformational changes or amino acid mutations), is a more challenging problem but has the promise to separate meaningfully different structures from crystal populations. Previous work has used the hierarchical clustering analysis of pairwise correlation coefficients to address this question (Matsuura et al., 2023), although the interpretation of the resulting dendrograms can be ambiguous and thus difficult to automate. Hierarchical clustering can also be heavily dependent on the choice of linkage method, and the analysis of pairwise correlation coefficients does not distinguish between random and systematic errors. Work by Diederichs (Diederichs, 2017), however, extends this intensity-based clustering method to distinguish the effects of random and systematic errors, providing a clearer separation of datasets. These methods have since been extended within dials.cosym and applied in xia2.multiplex, a pipeline for the automatic scaling and merging of multi-crystal data (Gildea et al., 2022, Gildea & Winter, 2018). These intensity-based clustering methods, however, were still missing the key element of automatic selection of relevant subsets of data, which is critical for analysing high-throughput data collections. In this presentation, clustering methods in dials.cosym and xia2.multipex are explored, showing the improved and automated methods to provide unambiguous separation of crystals of bovine, porcine and human insulin which have isomorphous lattices (Figure 1). Weighting of pairwise correlation coefficients, and the implementation of spatial density-based clustering algorithms enable such separation and are now available within the DIALS framework.

Structural DynamicsVol. 12(5_Supplement)
Caterpillar (United States) (US), Cornell University (US), Diamond Light Source (GB), Research Complex at Harwell (GB), The Edgbaston Hospital (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Classical Studies and Philology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.