Public Views on Healthy Food Policies: A Qualitative Study on Pricing, Access, and Promotion

Abstract Background In the Netherlands, the prevalence of overweight individuals is projected to increase from 50% in 2022 to 64% by 2050. The current food environment predominantly promotes unhealthy dietary habits, with 83% of supermarket products not meeting dietary guidelines. Addressing this issue requires policies that foster a healthier food environment. However, such policies may conflict with individual freedom of choice and face public resistance. This study explores public acceptance of food environment interventions. Methods Four focus groups (each with six participants) were conducted in two Dutch regions. The two-hour sessions began with participants reflecting on their personal values regarding food and health. They were then presented with three intervention scenarios: (a) price increases on unhealthy supermarket products and/or price reductions on healthy products, (b) restrictions on unhealthy food pickup points, and (c) a ban on outdoor advertising of unhealthy food. The resulting discussions were thematically analyzed. Results Participants generally supported lowering the price of healthy food but opposed price increases on unhealthy food, perceiving it as an infringement on personal choice and disproportionately affecting low-income groups. Restrictions on unhealthy food pickup points and outdoor advertising faced less resistance but were widely seen as ineffective, leading to limited support. Conclusions Policies that incentivize healthy eating receive public support, whereas restrictive measures face resistance. If such policies are implemented, it is imperative to clearly communicate their necessity and effectiveness to enhance public acceptance. Key messages • Policies that incentivize healthy eating receive public support, whereas restrictive measures face resistance. • If restrictive policies are implemented, it is imperative to clearly communicate their necessity and effectiveness to enhance public acceptance.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf161.1362
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public Views on Healthy Food Policies: A Qualitative Study on Pricing, Access, and Promotion

European Journal of Public Health
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Public Views on Healthy Food Policies: A Qualitative Study on Pricing, Access, and Promotion

article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In the Netherlands, the prevalence of overweight individuals is projected to increase from 50% in 2022 to 64% by 2050. The current food environment predominantly promotes unhealthy dietary habits, with 83% of supermarket products not meeting dietary guidelines. Addressing this issue requires policies that foster a healthier food environment. However, such policies may conflict with individual freedom of choice and face public resistance. This study explores public acceptance of food environment interventions. Methods Four focus groups (each with six participants) were conducted in two Dutch regions. The two-hour sessions began with participants reflecting on their personal values regarding food and health. They were then presented with three intervention scenarios: (a) price increases on unhealthy supermarket products and/or price reductions on healthy products, (b) restrictions on unhealthy food pickup points, and (c) a ban on outdoor advertising of unhealthy food. The resulting discussions were thematically analyzed. Results Participants generally supported lowering the price of healthy food but opposed price increases on unhealthy food, perceiving it as an infringement on personal choice and disproportionately affecting low-income groups. Restrictions on unhealthy food pickup points and outdoor advertising faced less resistance but were widely seen as ineffective, leading to limited support. Conclusions Policies that incentivize healthy eating receive public support, whereas restrictive measures face resistance. If such policies are implemented, it is imperative to clearly communicate their necessity and effectiveness to enhance public acceptance. Key messages • Policies that incentivize healthy eating receive public support, whereas restrictive measures face resistance. • If restrictive policies are implemented, it is imperative to clearly communicate their necessity and effectiveness to enhance public acceptance.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_4)
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Public Views on Healthy Food Policies: A Qualitative Study on Pricing, Access, and Promotion · European Journal of Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS