Research on fire rescue suppression and control strategies for energy storage power stations based on case analysis

Driven by the global energy transition and carbon neutrality goals, lithium-ion battery storage systems (LiBSS) have been widely applied, yet their risk of thermal runaway has led to fire and even explosion accidents, posing a severe threat to the safety of rescue personnel. Through analyzing typical fire cases in energy storage stations and integrating fire rescue procedures, this paper conducts an in-depth study on the four primary risks of fire accidents in energy storage stations: high temperature, explosion, poisoning, and electric shock. The article presents relevant strategies for temperature reduction and cooling, cordoning off the area, respiratory protection, personal protection, and the selection of different fire extinguishing agents during the fire disposal process in energy storage stations. Using TNT vapor cloud equivalent modeling, the explosion equivalent of a 10 MWh station is estimated at 1.36 tons of TNT, with a lethal radius of 15.24 m and a severe injury radius of 42.09 m. Comparative analysis shows that evaporative cooling is 11.3 times more effective than convective cooling (2.26 MW vs. 0.2 MW). This provides theoretical guidance and practical reference for fire rescue in energy storage stations, helping to enhance rescue efficiency and safety levels.

Publication Details

Journal
IET conference proceedings.
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2025.3193
Primary Topic
Educational Reforms and Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research on fire rescue suppression and control strategies for energy storage power stations based on case analysis

IET conference proceedings.
Educational Reforms and Innovations
article

Research on fire rescue suppression and control strategies for energy storage power stations based on case analysis

article en

Abstract

Driven by the global energy transition and carbon neutrality goals, lithium-ion battery storage systems (LiBSS) have been widely applied, yet their risk of thermal runaway has led to fire and even explosion accidents, posing a severe threat to the safety of rescue personnel. Through analyzing typical fire cases in energy storage stations and integrating fire rescue procedures, this paper conducts an in-depth study on the four primary risks of fire accidents in energy storage stations: high temperature, explosion, poisoning, and electric shock. The article presents relevant strategies for temperature reduction and cooling, cordoning off the area, respiratory protection, personal protection, and the selection of different fire extinguishing agents during the fire disposal process in energy storage stations. Using TNT vapor cloud equivalent modeling, the explosion equivalent of a 10 MWh station is estimated at 1.36 tons of TNT, with a lethal radius of 15.24 m and a severe injury radius of 42.09 m. Comparative analysis shows that evaporative cooling is 11.3 times more effective than convective cooling (2.26 MW vs. 0.2 MW). This provides theoretical guidance and practical reference for fire rescue in energy storage stations, helping to enhance rescue efficiency and safety levels.

IET conference proceedings.Vol. 2025(26)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Educational Reforms and Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.