Strategies under Constraint: China’s Rise, Regional Responses, and the Strategic-Relational Dynamics of the Indo-Pacific

To understand how state structures are strategically selective, privileging certain strategies while constraining others; and how agents navigate these contexts to maximize their power and interests, the Strategic-Relational Approach (SRA), developed by Bob Jessop (2008), provides a critical political economy framework. SRA rejects the view of the state as a neutral or monolithic actor, instead conceptualizing it as a strategically selective field. SRA emphasizes the interplay between structural contexts (constraints, institutional legacies, and systemic pressures) and strategic agency (actors’ choices and maneuvers). Structures are not equally open to all strategies; they privilege some while constraining others. At the same time, institutional state agents develop strategies within these selective contexts to pursue their goals. Outcomes, therefore, result from the dialectical interaction between structural selectivity and strategic agency.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-06-01
Primary Topic
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies under Constraint: China’s Rise, Regional Responses, and the Strategic-Relational Dynamics of the Indo-Pacific

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
article

Strategies under Constraint: China’s Rise, Regional Responses, and the Strategic-Relational Dynamics of the Indo-Pacific

article en

Abstract

To understand how state structures are strategically selective, privileging certain strategies while constraining others; and how agents navigate these contexts to maximize their power and interests, the Strategic-Relational Approach (SRA), developed by Bob Jessop (2008), provides a critical political economy framework. SRA rejects the view of the state as a neutral or monolithic actor, instead conceptualizing it as a strategically selective field. SRA emphasizes the interplay between structural contexts (constraints, institutional legacies, and systemic pressures) and strategic agency (actors’ choices and maneuvers). Structures are not equally open to all strategies; they privilege some while constraining others. At the same time, institutional state agents develop strategies within these selective contexts to pursue their goals. Outcomes, therefore, result from the dialectical interaction between structural selectivity and strategic agency.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
West Visayas State University (PH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Island Studies and Pacific Affairs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.