The Politics of History in Girish Karnad's Tughlaq: A Play of Power and Paranoia

Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq (1971) stands as a powerful political allegory that reinterprets history to reflect the complexities of postcolonial governance. Set in the 14th century but resonating deeply with modern India, the play presents Muhammad bin Tughlaq not merely as a historical figure, but as a symbol of the tragic collapse of visionary politics. This paper explores the politics of history in Tughlaq, focusing on the Sultan’s paradoxical blend of secular idealism, rational governance, and tyrannical control. Through the use of irony, symbolism, and episodic structure, Karnad critiques the dangers of utopian leadership untempered by pragmatism or empathy. Tughlaq’s policies—rational on the surface—reveal an underlying absurdity when divorced from the lived realities of his subjects, resulting in state violence, mass suffering, and the erosion of trust. Drawing from historical sources, postcolonial criticism, and dramatic theory, the study shows how Karnad uses the past to interrogate the present. The play thus becomes a mirror for India’s own post-independence disillusionment, revealing the psychological and political consequences of unchecked power. Ultimately, Tughlaq is not just a historical drama, but a timeless political tragedy—exposing the cyclical nature of tyranny masked as reform and the fragility of idealism in the corridors of power.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-09-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17446463
Primary Topic
History of Computing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Politics of History in Girish Karnad's Tughlaq: A Play of Power and Paranoia

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
History of Computing Technologies
article

The Politics of History in Girish Karnad's Tughlaq: A Play of Power and Paranoia

article en

Abstract

Girish Karnad’s Tughlaq (1971) stands as a powerful political allegory that reinterprets history to reflect the complexities of postcolonial governance. Set in the 14th century but resonating deeply with modern India, the play presents Muhammad bin Tughlaq not merely as a historical figure, but as a symbol of the tragic collapse of visionary politics. This paper explores the politics of history in Tughlaq, focusing on the Sultan’s paradoxical blend of secular idealism, rational governance, and tyrannical control. Through the use of irony, symbolism, and episodic structure, Karnad critiques the dangers of utopian leadership untempered by pragmatism or empathy. Tughlaq’s policies—rational on the surface—reveal an underlying absurdity when divorced from the lived realities of his subjects, resulting in state violence, mass suffering, and the erosion of trust. Drawing from historical sources, postcolonial criticism, and dramatic theory, the study shows how Karnad uses the past to interrogate the present. The play thus becomes a mirror for India’s own post-independence disillusionment, revealing the psychological and political consequences of unchecked power. Ultimately, Tughlaq is not just a historical drama, but a timeless political tragedy—exposing the cyclical nature of tyranny masked as reform and the fragility of idealism in the corridors of power.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
M.J.P. Rohilkhand University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
History of Computing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.