Reproducible Benchmarks Reveal Instability of Quantum Kernel Methods versus Stability of Hybrid Variational Classifiers on NISQ Simulators

Author: Ahmad Rasidi¹¹ Independent Researcher; Undergraduate Student (3rd Semester, Bachelor’s Program), Bumigora University, Indonesia Abstract: Quantum Machine Learning (QML) stands at the frontier of near-term quantum computing applications, promising enhanced pattern recognition through quantum mechanical principles. However, empirical validation of QML models under Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) constraints remains fragmented and often lacks reproducibility and cross-platform consistency. This work presents a comprehensive benchmark comparing two canonical QML paradigms Hybrid Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) using a unified open-source framework built on PennyLane, PyTorch, Qiskit, and scikit-learn. The study introduces a reproducible, modular, and cross-device pipeline featuring YAML-driven configuration, deterministic seeding, automatic artifact logging, and support for CPU, CUDA, and MPS execution. Across six independent experimental runs (seeds 1001–1006), we evaluate test accuracy, F1-score, and ROC-AUC on a binary classification task. Results demonstrate that the Hybrid VQC achieves a mean test accuracy of 81.11% ± 5.75%, with consistently high F1-score (0.804 ± 0.055) and ROC-AUC (0.885 ± 0.060), showcasing robust performance despite optimization challenges inherent to variational algorithms. In stark contrast, the QSVM exhibits extreme instability: while achieving 50.3% accuracy in all runs (equivalent to random guessing on a balanced dataset), its F1-score varies dramatically, with a mean of 0.222 ± 0.365, primarily due to catastrophic failures (F1 = 0.000) in 4 out of 6 runs. This reveals the fragility of fixed quantum kernel methods under data variation, even for simple non-linear problems. The accompanying repository (GitHub – rasidi3112/Quantum-Machine-Learning) enables full reproducibility of all results and artifacts. This work establishes a transparent, statistically grounded benchmark for QML under NISQ constraints and highlights the critical trade-offs between the flexibility of hybrid approaches and the instability of kernel-based methods. “This document was partially refined using ChatGPT (OpenAI), and all content has been reviewed by the author.”

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-11-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17443299
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reproducible Benchmarks Reveal Instability of Quantum Kernel Methods versus Stability of Hybrid Variational Classifiers on NISQ Simulators

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Reproducible Benchmarks Reveal Instability of Quantum Kernel Methods versus Stability of Hybrid Variational Classifiers on NISQ Simulators

article en

Abstract

Author: Ahmad Rasidi¹¹ Independent Researcher; Undergraduate Student (3rd Semester, Bachelor’s Program), Bumigora University, Indonesia Abstract: Quantum Machine Learning (QML) stands at the frontier of near-term quantum computing applications, promising enhanced pattern recognition through quantum mechanical principles. However, empirical validation of QML models under Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) constraints remains fragmented and often lacks reproducibility and cross-platform consistency. This work presents a comprehensive benchmark comparing two canonical QML paradigms Hybrid Variational Quantum Classifier (VQC) and Quantum Kernel Support Vector Machine (QSVM) using a unified open-source framework built on PennyLane, PyTorch, Qiskit, and scikit-learn. The study introduces a reproducible, modular, and cross-device pipeline featuring YAML-driven configuration, deterministic seeding, automatic artifact logging, and support for CPU, CUDA, and MPS execution. Across six independent experimental runs (seeds 1001–1006), we evaluate test accuracy, F1-score, and ROC-AUC on a binary classification task. Results demonstrate that the Hybrid VQC achieves a mean test accuracy of 81.11% ± 5.75%, with consistently high F1-score (0.804 ± 0.055) and ROC-AUC (0.885 ± 0.060), showcasing robust performance despite optimization challenges inherent to variational algorithms. In stark contrast, the QSVM exhibits extreme instability: while achieving 50.3% accuracy in all runs (equivalent to random guessing on a balanced dataset), its F1-score varies dramatically, with a mean of 0.222 ± 0.365, primarily due to catastrophic failures (F1 = 0.000) in 4 out of 6 runs. This reveals the fragility of fixed quantum kernel methods under data variation, even for simple non-linear problems. The accompanying repository (GitHub – rasidi3112/Quantum-Machine-Learning) enables full reproducibility of all results and artifacts. This work establishes a transparent, statistically grounded benchmark for QML under NISQ constraints and highlights the critical trade-offs between the flexibility of hybrid approaches and the instability of kernel-based methods. “This document was partially refined using ChatGPT (OpenAI), and all content has been reviewed by the author.”

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.