C053 | REAL-WORLD, MULTI-OMICS VALIDATION OF THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF MOLECULAR TAXONOMY FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES. AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY ON BEHALF OF GENOMED4ALL, SYNTHEMA AND ICMDS CONSORTIUMS

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clinically and biologically heterogeneous disorders, highlighting the need for personalized treatment strategies. The IWG_PM has recently proposed a molecular classification—referred to as the MDS taxonomy—which stratifies patients into 16 subgroups based on 21 gene mutations, 6 cytogenetic abnormalities, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the TP53 and TET2 loci. This study aimed to validate and extend the clinical utility of the MDS taxonomy in clinical decision-making process by analyzing a large retrospective cohort (n = 5,136) and transcriptomic data from a prospective cohort (n = 477). We confirmed that MDS taxonomy identifies subgroups with distinct clinical features and disease trajectories. The IPSS-M outperformed MDS taxonomy in predicting patients’ clinical outcomes. Furthermore, gene interactions defined by MDS subgroups did not significantly improve the prognostic accuracy of conventional models. We also examined whether MDS taxonomy could provide additional insights into managing patients receiving disease-modifying therapies. With the exception of the “TP53-complex” subgroup, the MDS taxonomy was not predictive of response to hypomethylating agents nor effective in identifying patients at high risk of transplant failure. RNA sequencing was used to validate the biological distinctiveness of MDS taxonomy groups. A random forest-based classification algorithm was applied to predict MDS taxonomy from differentially expressed genes. The algorithm’s accuracy varied across subgroups, with recall rates of 94%, 88%, 75%, and 71% for AML-like, SF3B1, biTET2, and TP53-complex groups, respectively. Classification accuracy was notably lower for other subcategories. To explore the biological significance of these transcriptomic signatures, we performed gene set enrichment analysis. Significant enrichment of gene ontology terms was observed only in the SF3B1, biTET2 and TP53-complex subgroups. SF3B1 MDS exhibited strong upregulation of genes involved in erythroid differentiation; biTET2 patients showed down-regulation of innate immune response mediated by Toll like receptor, IRAK4, MyD88/NFKB; TP53-complex subgroup showed specific overexpression of genes related to NOTCH and IFN-gamma signaling pathways Further research integrating multi-omics approaches is needed to develop a mechanistic MDS classification that could improve clinical decision-making and inform novel therapeutic strategies.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C053 | REAL-WORLD, MULTI-OMICS VALIDATION OF THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF MOLECULAR TAXONOMY FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES. AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY ON BEHALF OF GENOMED4ALL, SYNTHEMA AND ICMDS CONSORTIUMS

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
article

C053 | REAL-WORLD, MULTI-OMICS VALIDATION OF THE CLINICAL RELEVANCE OF MOLECULAR TAXONOMY FOR MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES. AN INTERNATIONAL STUDY ON BEHALF OF GENOMED4ALL, SYNTHEMA AND ICMDS CONSORTIUMS

article en

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) are clinically and biologically heterogeneous disorders, highlighting the need for personalized treatment strategies. The IWG_PM has recently proposed a molecular classification—referred to as the MDS taxonomy—which stratifies patients into 16 subgroups based on 21 gene mutations, 6 cytogenetic abnormalities, and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the TP53 and TET2 loci. This study aimed to validate and extend the clinical utility of the MDS taxonomy in clinical decision-making process by analyzing a large retrospective cohort (n = 5,136) and transcriptomic data from a prospective cohort (n = 477). We confirmed that MDS taxonomy identifies subgroups with distinct clinical features and disease trajectories. The IPSS-M outperformed MDS taxonomy in predicting patients’ clinical outcomes. Furthermore, gene interactions defined by MDS subgroups did not significantly improve the prognostic accuracy of conventional models. We also examined whether MDS taxonomy could provide additional insights into managing patients receiving disease-modifying therapies. With the exception of the “TP53-complex” subgroup, the MDS taxonomy was not predictive of response to hypomethylating agents nor effective in identifying patients at high risk of transplant failure. RNA sequencing was used to validate the biological distinctiveness of MDS taxonomy groups. A random forest-based classification algorithm was applied to predict MDS taxonomy from differentially expressed genes. The algorithm’s accuracy varied across subgroups, with recall rates of 94%, 88%, 75%, and 71% for AML-like, SF3B1, biTET2, and TP53-complex groups, respectively. Classification accuracy was notably lower for other subcategories. To explore the biological significance of these transcriptomic signatures, we performed gene set enrichment analysis. Significant enrichment of gene ontology terms was observed only in the SF3B1, biTET2 and TP53-complex subgroups. SF3B1 MDS exhibited strong upregulation of genes involved in erythroid differentiation; biTET2 patients showed down-regulation of innate immune response mediated by Toll like receptor, IRAK4, MyD88/NFKB; TP53-complex subgroup showed specific overexpression of genes related to NOTCH and IFN-gamma signaling pathways Further research integrating multi-omics approaches is needed to develop a mechanistic MDS classification that could improve clinical decision-making and inform novel therapeutic strategies.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.