A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Architectures for Classifying Malignant Lung Nodules in CT Scans

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, underscoring the need for improved early detection methods. While deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have shown promise in analyzing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for pulmonary nodule classification, a comparative analysis of modern CNN architectures for this specific task is limited. This study aims to conduct a rigorous head-to-head evaluation of ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet for benign-malignant classification of lung nodules. Using the publicly available LIDC-IDRI dataset of thoracic CT scans, we developed a deep learning pipeline for binary nodule classification. The dataset was preprocessed, and 8,420 annotated nodule patches were extracted and augmented. Three CNN architectures—ResNet50, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0—were initialized with ImageNet pre-trained weights and fine-tuned. Model performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Interpretability was assessed using Grad-CAM visualizations. DenseNet121 achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 95.6% and an AUC of 0.982, demonstrating a superior balance of sensitivity and specificity and producing the fewest false negatives. EfficientNetB0 followed closely (AUC: 0.976) with the shortest training time, while ResNet50 was a strong but slightly less sensitive baseline (AUC: 0.964). Grad-CAM analysis confirmed that all models focused on relevant nodule regions, with DenseNet and EfficientNet exhibiting more localized activations. This study demonstrates that architectural choice significantly impacts performance in lung nodule malignancy classification. DenseNet emerged as the most effective backbone for this task, offering high discriminatory power and critical sensitivity to malignant cases.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
InfoScience Trends
Published
2025-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.61882/ist.202502.09.01
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Architectures for Classifying Malignant Lung Nodules in CT Scans

1 citations
InfoScience Trends
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
article

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Architectures for Classifying Malignant Lung Nodules in CT Scans

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide, underscoring the need for improved early detection methods. While deep learning models, particularly Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have shown promise in analyzing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans for pulmonary nodule classification, a comparative analysis of modern CNN architectures for this specific task is limited. This study aims to conduct a rigorous head-to-head evaluation of ResNet, DenseNet, and EfficientNet for benign-malignant classification of lung nodules. Using the publicly available LIDC-IDRI dataset of thoracic CT scans, we developed a deep learning pipeline for binary nodule classification. The dataset was preprocessed, and 8,420 annotated nodule patches were extracted and augmented. Three CNN architectures—ResNet50, DenseNet121, and EfficientNetB0—were initialized with ImageNet pre-trained weights and fine-tuned. Model performance was evaluated on a held-out test set using accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Interpretability was assessed using Grad-CAM visualizations. DenseNet121 achieved the highest performance with an accuracy of 95.6% and an AUC of 0.982, demonstrating a superior balance of sensitivity and specificity and producing the fewest false negatives. EfficientNetB0 followed closely (AUC: 0.976) with the shortest training time, while ResNet50 was a strong but slightly less sensitive baseline (AUC: 0.964). Grad-CAM analysis confirmed that all models focused on relevant nodule regions, with DenseNet and EfficientNet exhibiting more localized activations. This study demonstrates that architectural choice significantly impacts performance in lung nodule malignancy classification. DenseNet emerged as the most effective backbone for this task, offering high discriminatory power and critical sensitivity to malignant cases.

InfoScience TrendsVol. 2(9)
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (IR), Imam Khomeini Hospital (IR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
1.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparative Analysis of Deep Learning Architectures for Classifying Malignant Lung Nodules in CT Scans · InfoScience Trends (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS