Enterprise Liability for Human-AI-Decisions

Although AI systems are constantly improving, in most areas, it seems unlikely that they will completely replace humans in the near future. Rather, AI systems and humans will increasingly work side by side. Integration of Human-AI collaboration holds great promise for many enterprises. Introducing AI while keeping humans “in the loop” may allow for the full utilisation of both AI and human potential. However, such collaboration also creates specific risks of damages, which raises the question of enterprise liability. In jurisdictions where the liability of a principal requires fault, as generally in Germany, the answer to this question largely depends on the scope of the principal’s duties of care. These duties are examined in this paper. In the context of Human-AI-Decisions, the complexity of human decision-making, AI systems and, in particular, Human-AI cooperation can make it difficult to identify a principal’s duties of care. This paper shows how a multidisciplinary approach can help to overcome some obstacles. It does not provide an exhaustive list of the principal’s duties of care. Rather, it sets out a methodological framework and illustrates the value of non-legal AI research with specific examples. The paper also briefly discusses the proposed, but now abandoned AI Liability Directive.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25365/vlr-2025-9-3-35
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enterprise Liability for Human-AI-Decisions

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Enterprise Liability for Human-AI-Decisions

article en

Abstract

Although AI systems are constantly improving, in most areas, it seems unlikely that they will completely replace humans in the near future. Rather, AI systems and humans will increasingly work side by side. Integration of Human-AI collaboration holds great promise for many enterprises. Introducing AI while keeping humans “in the loop” may allow for the full utilisation of both AI and human potential. However, such collaboration also creates specific risks of damages, which raises the question of enterprise liability. In jurisdictions where the liability of a principal requires fault, as generally in Germany, the answer to this question largely depends on the scope of the principal’s duties of care. These duties are examined in this paper. In the context of Human-AI-Decisions, the complexity of human decision-making, AI systems and, in particular, Human-AI cooperation can make it difficult to identify a principal’s duties of care. This paper shows how a multidisciplinary approach can help to overcome some obstacles. It does not provide an exhaustive list of the principal’s duties of care. Rather, it sets out a methodological framework and illustrates the value of non-legal AI research with specific examples. The paper also briefly discusses the proposed, but now abandoned AI Liability Directive.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Enterprise Liability for Human-AI-Decisions · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS