True Costs of Misinformation| Exploring Audience Agency in Countering Misinformation

Drawing on 41 in-depth interviews with media professionals, policy and media experts, and 50 social media users in Kenya and Senegal, this study uncovers conceptual gaps in how the two groups understand misinformation and reveals differences in how they view the role of “the audience” in stopping the spread of misinformation. Although media professionals and policy and media experts connect misinformation to the news, social media users relate it to “everyday” misinformation. We also find that professionals believe they have a role in stopping misinformation by creating high-quality information but are not always confident that audiences engage with their work. This is supported by interviews with social media users who say they rarely seek out fact-checks or media literacy messages. Our findings also suggest that some social media users believe they have high levels of agency in addressing misinformation, but not all exercise it.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-06-01
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

True Costs of Misinformation| Exploring Audience Agency in Countering Misinformation

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

True Costs of Misinformation| Exploring Audience Agency in Countering Misinformation

article en

Abstract

Drawing on 41 in-depth interviews with media professionals, policy and media experts, and 50 social media users in Kenya and Senegal, this study uncovers conceptual gaps in how the two groups understand misinformation and reveals differences in how they view the role of “the audience” in stopping the spread of misinformation. Although media professionals and policy and media experts connect misinformation to the news, social media users relate it to “everyday” misinformation. We also find that professionals believe they have a role in stopping misinformation by creating high-quality information but are not always confident that audiences engage with their work. This is supported by interviews with social media users who say they rarely seek out fact-checks or media literacy messages. Our findings also suggest that some social media users believe they have high levels of agency in addressing misinformation, but not all exercise it.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Iowa (US), Georgia State University (US), Francis Marion University (US), Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

True Costs of Misinformation| Exploring Audience Agency in Countering Misinformation · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS