Oops? Interdisciplinary Stories of Sociotechnical Error| Fake It Till You Make It: Synthetic Data and Algorithmic Bias

This article interrogates the claim that synthetic data is a risk-free and ethical solution to algorithmic bias. Synthetic data refers to artificial intelligence (AI)-generated datasets that substitute real-life data to train machine learning (ML) models. We examine how bias is supposedly corrected by synthetic data through the three key methods: (1) rebalancing the dataset, (2) the de- and reconstruction of data, and (3) classification. We argue that proponents of synthetic data presume that algorithmic bias resides in the lack of diversity in training data—rather than in sociopolitical inequalities—and mobilize prescriptions for fairness, bias correction, and equitable representations of gender and race. Practices in synthetic data assume that an unbiased, neutral state exists and can be achieved artificially. Analyzing this technical “solution” shows how mainstream ML discourse understands bias as a sociotechnical error. Building on existing literature on algorithmic bias, this article shows how synthetic data, despite promises to the contrary, actually exacerbates and creates new forms of inequality.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oops? Interdisciplinary Stories of Sociotechnical Error| Fake It Till You Make It: Synthetic Data and Algorithmic Bias

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Oops? Interdisciplinary Stories of Sociotechnical Error| Fake It Till You Make It: Synthetic Data and Algorithmic Bias

article en

Abstract

This article interrogates the claim that synthetic data is a risk-free and ethical solution to algorithmic bias. Synthetic data refers to artificial intelligence (AI)-generated datasets that substitute real-life data to train machine learning (ML) models. We examine how bias is supposedly corrected by synthetic data through the three key methods: (1) rebalancing the dataset, (2) the de- and reconstruction of data, and (3) classification. We argue that proponents of synthetic data presume that algorithmic bias resides in the lack of diversity in training data—rather than in sociopolitical inequalities—and mobilize prescriptions for fairness, bias correction, and equitable representations of gender and race. Practices in synthetic data assume that an unbiased, neutral state exists and can be achieved artificially. Analyzing this technical “solution” shows how mainstream ML discourse understands bias as a sociotechnical error. Building on existing literature on algorithmic bias, this article shows how synthetic data, despite promises to the contrary, actually exacerbates and creates new forms of inequality.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Southern California (US), California Southern University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.