The Networked Amplification of Activist Voices: An Empirical Framework for Evaluating the Growth and Challenges of Information Diffusion Efforts During Hashtag Campaigns

The hashtag campaign around #TWforWHO and #TaiwanCanHelp aimed to bring international attention to Taiwan’s exclusion from the global COVID-19 pandemic response. We use this campaign as a case study to develop and apply a social network analysis framework for evaluating the diffusion of hashtag campaigns. We collected and analyzed 121,711 tweets containing the two hashtags, which were published between February 9 and May 2, 2020, resulting in a retweet network of 23,715 users. We find that the movement improved over time on three of four growth indicators—increased size, geographic spread, and inclusion of elite users—while the network simultaneously became less stable. We find no evidence of major changes in the campaign’s reach following a paid advertisement in the New York Times. Our approach provides guidelines for understanding and assessing message propagation by elites and non-elites.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Networked Amplification of Activist Voices: An Empirical Framework for Evaluating the Growth and Challenges of Information Diffusion Efforts During Hashtag Campaigns

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Social Media and Politics
article

The Networked Amplification of Activist Voices: An Empirical Framework for Evaluating the Growth and Challenges of Information Diffusion Efforts During Hashtag Campaigns

article en

Abstract

The hashtag campaign around #TWforWHO and #TaiwanCanHelp aimed to bring international attention to Taiwan’s exclusion from the global COVID-19 pandemic response. We use this campaign as a case study to develop and apply a social network analysis framework for evaluating the diffusion of hashtag campaigns. We collected and analyzed 121,711 tweets containing the two hashtags, which were published between February 9 and May 2, 2020, resulting in a retweet network of 23,715 users. We find that the movement improved over time on three of four growth indicators—increased size, geographic spread, and inclusion of elite users—while the network simultaneously became less stable. We find no evidence of major changes in the campaign’s reach following a paid advertisement in the New York Times. Our approach provides guidelines for understanding and assessing message propagation by elites and non-elites.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
National Taiwan University (TW), Georgia State University (US), University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Networked Amplification of Activist Voices: An Empirical Framework for Evaluating the Growth and Challenges of Information Diffusion Efforts During Hashtag Campaigns · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS