-

The aim of this study was to perform a validation of the Aquanex system to assess in-water forces during aquatic exercise. One sensor (Type A) that composes the differential pressure system (Aquanex v.4.1, STR, USA) was placed inside a wind tunnel (Axial Propellor Fan, England), this last being considered as the gold standard technique for measurement. A frequency inverter was used to control a range of twenty-two frequencies. The mean force (FMEAN, N) acting on the sensor and in the wind tunnel model was measured. The validation criteria were defined as follows: (i) p>0.05 in a paired t-test; (ii) R2≥0.49 in a simple linear regression model; and (iii) at least 80 % of the plots within the limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots. The results showed no differences between both methods (p=0.884). A significant relationship with a high effect (R2=0.573, p<0.001) was found, as well as a small bias (0.002 N) between the two methods. Thus, the Aquanex system seems to be valid for assessing the in-water forces as it meets all the validation criteria.

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Published
2024-09-30
Primary Topic
Schizophrenia research and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

-

Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Schizophrenia research and treatment
article

-

article en

Abstract

The aim of this study was to perform a validation of the Aquanex system to assess in-water forces during aquatic exercise. One sensor (Type A) that composes the differential pressure system (Aquanex v.4.1, STR, USA) was placed inside a wind tunnel (Axial Propellor Fan, England), this last being considered as the gold standard technique for measurement. A frequency inverter was used to control a range of twenty-two frequencies. The mean force (FMEAN, N) acting on the sensor and in the wind tunnel model was measured. The validation criteria were defined as follows: (i) p>0.05 in a paired t-test; (ii) R2≥0.49 in a simple linear regression model; and (iii) at least 80 % of the plots within the limits of agreement in the Bland-Altman plots. The results showed no differences between both methods (p=0.884). A significant relationship with a high effect (R2=0.573, p<0.001) was found, as well as a small bias (0.002 N) between the two methods. Thus, the Aquanex system seems to be valid for assessing the in-water forces as it meets all the validation criteria.

Scientific Repository of Open Access of Portugal (RCAAP)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Schizophrenia research and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.