Nurses’ Reports of Inhaler Use Errors in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hong Kong

Shu-Wah Ng,1 Maggie PK Lit,2 Agnes YK Lai3 1Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China; 2Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing and Health Sciences Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Agnes YK Lai, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, 11th Floor, Jockey Club Institute of Healthcare, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, 1 Sheung Shing Street, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Tel +852-3970-2917, Email [email protected]: Persistently high rates of inhaler errors and poor adherence among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients contribute to ineffective symptomatic control, high care burdens, and increased healthcare resource utilization.Objective: This study aimed to report (i) nurses-identified common problems and errors of inhaler use in COPD patients, (ii) nurses’ attitudes, practices, training needs and required support in inhaler education.Methods: An online questionnaire survey was conducted with nurses working in Hong Kong from May to June 2023 using an exponential, non-discriminative snowball sampling strategy.Results: Of 156 nurses (67.3% female, 41% aged 40 or above), 37.2% and 62.8% of them had more than 10 years of experience in medical units and received respiratory-related specialist training, respectively. About 86% and 82% perceived that their patients did not have adequate basic knowledge and had incorrect use of their inhaled medications. High rates of inhaler use errors were observed by nurses across all phases: preparation (50%– 92%), pre-inhalation (45%– 89%), inhalation (69%– 89%), and aftercare (66%– 85%). Nurses with ≥ 10 years of working experience in medical units or specialist training showed significantly more confidence in educating on inhaler use, engaging in more discussion with patients about inhaler use, and assessing patient inhaler use techniques more frequently than those with less experience or no respiratory-related specialist training with small effect size (Cohens’d: 0.26– 0.33).Conclusion: Inhaler use errors were common issues among COPD patients in Hong Kong. Enhanced professional training and support in inhaler education could improve nurses’ confidence and practices in conducting patient education on inhaler use.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nurses’ experience, inhaler, errors, clinical experience

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2024-12-31
Primary Topic
Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nurses’ Reports of Inhaler Use Errors in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hong Kong

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
article

Nurses’ Reports of Inhaler Use Errors in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease in Hong Kong

article en

Abstract

Shu-Wah Ng,1 Maggie PK Lit,2 Agnes YK Lai3 1Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine and Geriatrics, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China; 2Division of Respiratory Medicine, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Nursing and Health Sciences Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Agnes YK Lai, School of Nursing and Health Sciences, 11th Floor, Jockey Club Institute of Healthcare, Hong Kong Metropolitan University, 1 Sheung Shing Street, Homantin, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Tel +852-3970-2917, Email [email protected]: Persistently high rates of inhaler errors and poor adherence among Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) patients contribute to ineffective symptomatic control, high care burdens, and increased healthcare resource utilization.Objective: This study aimed to report (i) nurses-identified common problems and errors of inhaler use in COPD patients, (ii) nurses’ attitudes, practices, training needs and required support in inhaler education.Methods: An online questionnaire survey was conducted with nurses working in Hong Kong from May to June 2023 using an exponential, non-discriminative snowball sampling strategy.Results: Of 156 nurses (67.3% female, 41% aged 40 or above), 37.2% and 62.8% of them had more than 10 years of experience in medical units and received respiratory-related specialist training, respectively. About 86% and 82% perceived that their patients did not have adequate basic knowledge and had incorrect use of their inhaled medications. High rates of inhaler use errors were observed by nurses across all phases: preparation (50%– 92%), pre-inhalation (45%– 89%), inhalation (69%– 89%), and aftercare (66%– 85%). Nurses with ≥ 10 years of working experience in medical units or specialist training showed significantly more confidence in educating on inhaler use, engaging in more discussion with patients about inhaler use, and assessing patient inhaler use techniques more frequently than those with less experience or no respiratory-related specialist training with small effect size (Cohens’d: 0.26– 0.33).Conclusion: Inhaler use errors were common issues among COPD patients in Hong Kong. Enhanced professional training and support in inhaler education could improve nurses’ confidence and practices in conducting patient education on inhaler use.Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, nurses’ experience, inhaler, errors, clinical experience

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.