Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800

Aadithreya Varman, Arulmozhi Varman, Dinesh Balakumar Uma Eye Clinic, Chennai, IndiaCorrespondence: Aadithreya Varman, Uma Eye Clinic, O Block, No. 995, 2 nd Avenue, Annanagar, Chennai, 600040, India, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the visual outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction using a new version of a femtosecond laser platform with semi-automated cyclotorsion compensation in comparison to the previous generation without cyclotorsion control.Methods: This was an ambispective study of consecutive eyes treated by SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 femtosecond lasers at the Uma Eye clinic, Chennai, India between June 2022 and July 2023. Inclusion criteria were myopia up to − 10 D and astigmatism between 1.5 D and 5 D. Data was retrospectively collected from patients that underwent SMILE using the VisuMax without cyclotorsion compensation and prospectively collected from patients undergoing SMILE using the VISUMAX 800 with Oculign and Centralign software aids.Results: Data was collected from a total of 220 eyes that underwent routine SMILE; 115 eyes with VisuMax (VM500 group) and 105 eyes with VISUMAX 800 (VM800 group). The mean attempted spherical equivalent was − 4.82± 2.16 D in the VM500 group and − 4.80± 2.24 in the VM800 group. At the 3-month postoperative visit, 94% of eyes in the VM500 group and 98% of eyes in the VM800 group had an UDVA of 20/20 or better. Accuracy of the SEQ showed that 71% of eyes were within ± 0.50 D and 100% were within ± 1.00 D of target in the VM500 group and 96% of eyes were within ± 0.50 D and 100% were within ± 1.00 D of target in the VM800 group. There were no reported cases of suction loss or any other intraoperative complication in either group.Conclusion: SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes for subjects with myopic astigmatism. The VISUMAX 800, using Oculign and Centralign aids, demonstrated better accuracy when correcting cylinder greater than 2 D compared to the VisuMax without using manual cyclotorsion compensation.Keywords: small-incision lenticule extraction, VISUMAX 800, astigmatism

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2024-11-30
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800

article en

Abstract

Aadithreya Varman, Arulmozhi Varman, Dinesh Balakumar Uma Eye Clinic, Chennai, IndiaCorrespondence: Aadithreya Varman, Uma Eye Clinic, O Block, No. 995, 2 nd Avenue, Annanagar, Chennai, 600040, India, Email [email protected]: To evaluate the visual outcomes of keratorefractive lenticule extraction using a new version of a femtosecond laser platform with semi-automated cyclotorsion compensation in comparison to the previous generation without cyclotorsion control.Methods: This was an ambispective study of consecutive eyes treated by SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 femtosecond lasers at the Uma Eye clinic, Chennai, India between June 2022 and July 2023. Inclusion criteria were myopia up to − 10 D and astigmatism between 1.5 D and 5 D. Data was retrospectively collected from patients that underwent SMILE using the VisuMax without cyclotorsion compensation and prospectively collected from patients undergoing SMILE using the VISUMAX 800 with Oculign and Centralign software aids.Results: Data was collected from a total of 220 eyes that underwent routine SMILE; 115 eyes with VisuMax (VM500 group) and 105 eyes with VISUMAX 800 (VM800 group). The mean attempted spherical equivalent was − 4.82± 2.16 D in the VM500 group and − 4.80± 2.24 in the VM800 group. At the 3-month postoperative visit, 94% of eyes in the VM500 group and 98% of eyes in the VM800 group had an UDVA of 20/20 or better. Accuracy of the SEQ showed that 71% of eyes were within ± 0.50 D and 100% were within ± 1.00 D of target in the VM500 group and 96% of eyes were within ± 0.50 D and 100% were within ± 1.00 D of target in the VM800 group. There were no reported cases of suction loss or any other intraoperative complication in either group.Conclusion: SMILE with the VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 provided excellent visual and refractive outcomes for subjects with myopic astigmatism. The VISUMAX 800, using Oculign and Centralign aids, demonstrated better accuracy when correcting cylinder greater than 2 D compared to the VisuMax without using manual cyclotorsion compensation.Keywords: small-incision lenticule extraction, VISUMAX 800, astigmatism

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Keratorefractive Lenticule Extraction for Compound Myopic Astigmatism Between VisuMax and VISUMAX 800 · Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS