GraspOS SCOPE+i Resource: Guide on principles for responsible research assessment for evaluators and evaluands

Responsible Research Assessment (RRA) is the practice of evaluating researchers and their work in a fair, transparent, and context-sensitive way. It goes beyond narrow metrics (e.g., journal impact factors, h-index) to recognise the diverse contributions researchers make to science and society. RRA encourages: Qualitative expert judgement balanced with responsible use of metrics. Recognition of diverse outputs (data, software, teaching, community engagement, peer review). Attention to open science practices, interdisciplinarity, collaboration, and societal impact. Equity and inclusivity by counteracting systemic biases and valuing varied career paths. This guide is meant both for funders and employers as well as researchers (as reviewers and as subjects of evaluation). It defines the motivation and principles for RRA by introducing a relevant set of regulations and recommendations. Two documents published. Actionable version – a short version. Full resource – a long version on which the Actionable version is based on.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15526024
Primary Topic
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

GraspOS SCOPE+i Resource: Guide on principles for responsible research assessment for evaluators and evaluands

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
article

GraspOS SCOPE+i Resource: Guide on principles for responsible research assessment for evaluators and evaluands

article en

Abstract

Responsible Research Assessment (RRA) is the practice of evaluating researchers and their work in a fair, transparent, and context-sensitive way. It goes beyond narrow metrics (e.g., journal impact factors, h-index) to recognise the diverse contributions researchers make to science and society. RRA encourages: Qualitative expert judgement balanced with responsible use of metrics. Recognition of diverse outputs (data, software, teaching, community engagement, peer review). Attention to open science practices, interdisciplinarity, collaboration, and societal impact. Equity and inclusivity by counteracting systemic biases and valuing varied career paths. This guide is meant both for funders and employers as well as researchers (as reviewers and as subjects of evaluation). It defines the motivation and principles for RRA by introducing a relevant set of regulations and recommendations. Two documents published. Actionable version – a short version. Full resource – a long version on which the Actionable version is based on.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Federation of Finnish Learned Societies (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.