Targeted Tissue Perfusion Versus Macrocirculatory-Guided Standard Care in Patients With Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial-The TARTARE-2S Trial.

Objectives To determine whether treatment targeting improving tissue perfusion while allowing lower than recommended blood pressure (targeted tissue perfusion [TTP]) improves outcome compared with mean arterial pressure (MAP)-guided standard care (SC). Design A randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial with 30-day follow-up. Allocation was stratified according to trial site and presence of chronic arterial hypertension. Setting Three European university hospital ICUs with enrollment from 2016 to 2022. Patients Two hundred nineteen patients with septic shock and blood lactate greater than 3 mmol/L allocated to TTP (n = 111) vs. SC (n = 108). Interventions The TTP protocol comprised capillary refill time, peripheral skin temperature, arterial lactate concentrations, and MAP 50-65 mm Hg. The SC protocol comprised the hemodynamic targets of 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Measurements And Main Results Ninety-seven (87.4%) in TTP and 97 (89.8%) in SC group (total n = 194) were analyzed for the primary outcome. The median (interquartile range) of days alive in 30 days with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs (primary outcome) was 23 (10-27) in TTP group and 22 (1-27) in SC group (difference in medians, 0.59; 95% CI, -3 to 4). Secondary outcomes (single components of the primary outcome, days alive without organ support and mortality, all at 30 d) and serious adverse reactions were not significantly different between intervention groups. At day 30, 24 patients (24.7%) in TTP group vs. 27 patients (27.8%) in SC group had died. MAP levels were lower in the TTP group vs. the SC group. Conclusions In ICU patients with septic shock and lactate greater than 3 mmol/L, targeting tissue perfusion and allowing lower than recommended MAP did not increase the number of days alive with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs at 30 days. No additional safety concerns with the TTP strategy were detected compared with SC.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/92027
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Targeted Tissue Perfusion Versus Macrocirculatory-Guided Standard Care in Patients With Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial-The TARTARE-2S Trial.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Targeted Tissue Perfusion Versus Macrocirculatory-Guided Standard Care in Patients With Septic Shock: A Randomized Clinical Trial-The TARTARE-2S Trial.

article en

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether treatment targeting improving tissue perfusion while allowing lower than recommended blood pressure (targeted tissue perfusion [TTP]) improves outcome compared with mean arterial pressure (MAP)-guided standard care (SC). Design A randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial with 30-day follow-up. Allocation was stratified according to trial site and presence of chronic arterial hypertension. Setting Three European university hospital ICUs with enrollment from 2016 to 2022. Patients Two hundred nineteen patients with septic shock and blood lactate greater than 3 mmol/L allocated to TTP (n = 111) vs. SC (n = 108). Interventions The TTP protocol comprised capillary refill time, peripheral skin temperature, arterial lactate concentrations, and MAP 50-65 mm Hg. The SC protocol comprised the hemodynamic targets of 2012 Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Measurements And Main Results Ninety-seven (87.4%) in TTP and 97 (89.8%) in SC group (total n = 194) were analyzed for the primary outcome. The median (interquartile range) of days alive in 30 days with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs (primary outcome) was 23 (10-27) in TTP group and 22 (1-27) in SC group (difference in medians, 0.59; 95% CI, -3 to 4). Secondary outcomes (single components of the primary outcome, days alive without organ support and mortality, all at 30 d) and serious adverse reactions were not significantly different between intervention groups. At day 30, 24 patients (24.7%) in TTP group vs. 27 patients (27.8%) in SC group had died. MAP levels were lower in the TTP group vs. the SC group. Conclusions In ICU patients with septic shock and lactate greater than 3 mmol/L, targeting tissue perfusion and allowing lower than recommended MAP did not increase the number of days alive with normal lactate and without vasopressor/inotropic drugs at 30 days. No additional safety concerns with the TTP strategy were detected compared with SC.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Intensive Care Foundation (AU), Intensive Care Society (GB), Fincantieri (Italy) (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.