Microbial Colonizers in an Agroecosystem Under Diverse Cover Crop Treatments

Cover crops are often incorporated between cash crop seasons to improve or maintain soil health. Although their effects on certain soil properties (e.g., erosion control) are well described, their potential to steer soil microbial composition and function remains poorly understood. Most studies use direct soil sampling to investigate this relationship, but long-dormant microorganisms and legacy DNA can mask treatment effects, leading to signals that may not reflect active contributors to key functions such as biogeochemical cycling and decomposition. In this study, we deployed microbial traps (i.e., sterile soil enclosed in permeable mesh) to contrast active recolonization with direct soil sampling across 11 cover crop treatments applied after fall cash crop harvests in the northeast United States. Bulk and recolonized soil were collected for 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer region amplicon sequencing before (i) winter and (ii) spring planting. We hypothesized that different cover crop mixtures would stimulate distinct pools of microbial colonizers, with stronger between-treatment effects in recolonized soil compared with bulk. Our results showed that crop treatments significantly influenced microbial composition of active colonizers; however, effect sizes were similar in both bulk and recolonized (explaining 12 to 18% of community variance). The presence or absence of plant cover was the strongest driver of compositional differences in both soil compartments, suggesting microbial traps and bulk soil can capture similar signals despite containing ecologically distinct microbiome subsets. Future work coupling community assembly in situ with functionally informative methods may further resolve whether active colonizers overlap with root-associated taxa and can lead to management-relevant outcomes. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Phytobiomes Journal
Published
2025-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1094/pbiomes-07-25-0054-r
Primary Topic
Ovarian function and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbial Colonizers in an Agroecosystem Under Diverse Cover Crop Treatments

Phytobiomes Journal
Ovarian function and disorders
article

Microbial Colonizers in an Agroecosystem Under Diverse Cover Crop Treatments

article en

Abstract

Cover crops are often incorporated between cash crop seasons to improve or maintain soil health. Although their effects on certain soil properties (e.g., erosion control) are well described, their potential to steer soil microbial composition and function remains poorly understood. Most studies use direct soil sampling to investigate this relationship, but long-dormant microorganisms and legacy DNA can mask treatment effects, leading to signals that may not reflect active contributors to key functions such as biogeochemical cycling and decomposition. In this study, we deployed microbial traps (i.e., sterile soil enclosed in permeable mesh) to contrast active recolonization with direct soil sampling across 11 cover crop treatments applied after fall cash crop harvests in the northeast United States. Bulk and recolonized soil were collected for 16S rRNA gene and internal transcribed spacer region amplicon sequencing before (i) winter and (ii) spring planting. We hypothesized that different cover crop mixtures would stimulate distinct pools of microbial colonizers, with stronger between-treatment effects in recolonized soil compared with bulk. Our results showed that crop treatments significantly influenced microbial composition of active colonizers; however, effect sizes were similar in both bulk and recolonized (explaining 12 to 18% of community variance). The presence or absence of plant cover was the strongest driver of compositional differences in both soil compartments, suggesting microbial traps and bulk soil can capture similar signals despite containing ecologically distinct microbiome subsets. Future work coupling community assembly in situ with functionally informative methods may further resolve whether active colonizers overlap with root-associated taxa and can lead to management-relevant outcomes. [Formula: see text] Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license .

Phytobiomes JournalVol. 10(1)
Pennsylvania State University (US), University of Toronto (CA), Scarborough Health Network (CA), University of Southampton (GB), University of Almería (ES)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Ovarian function and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.