Creating woodland through natural processes: Current understanding and knowledge gaps in Great Britain

Abstract Creating woodlands through natural processes, as opposed to traditional tree planting, is expected to result in more structurally diverse, locally adapted woodlands that enhance the resilience of existing treescapes. However, the outcomes of natural colonisation can be variable, and there is still considerable uncertainty around the ecological processes involved. To address knowledge gaps and guide a future research and policy agenda, we synthesise current knowledge of the ecology of natural colonisation in Great Britain. We combine expertise from 31 practitioners and researchers spanning varied British contexts, including insights from 15 case studies and an expert survey on the relative importance of ecological factors influencing natural colonisation. The most important determinants of successful natural colonisation, identified by practitioners and researchers, were the availability of seed sources and low levels of herbivory. However, key knowledge gaps remain around the timeframe and trajectory of woodland development and appropriate management practices. Natural colonisation and tree planting can be combined to meet diverse woodland objectives, but this has been little explored to date. Solutions . Land managers and advisors face uncertainty and many knowledge gaps when creating woodland through natural processes. Site monitoring and adaptive management can help meet site objectives that, in turn, can be supported by policies reflecting uncertainties in the process. Collaboration between researchers and land managers to monitor woodland development, use experimental approaches and share knowledge will help further applied ecological understanding, supporting informed decision‐making by land managers.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70127
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Creating woodland through natural processes: Current understanding and knowledge gaps in Great Britain

Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Creating woodland through natural processes: Current understanding and knowledge gaps in Great Britain

article en

Abstract

Abstract Creating woodlands through natural processes, as opposed to traditional tree planting, is expected to result in more structurally diverse, locally adapted woodlands that enhance the resilience of existing treescapes. However, the outcomes of natural colonisation can be variable, and there is still considerable uncertainty around the ecological processes involved. To address knowledge gaps and guide a future research and policy agenda, we synthesise current knowledge of the ecology of natural colonisation in Great Britain. We combine expertise from 31 practitioners and researchers spanning varied British contexts, including insights from 15 case studies and an expert survey on the relative importance of ecological factors influencing natural colonisation. The most important determinants of successful natural colonisation, identified by practitioners and researchers, were the availability of seed sources and low levels of herbivory. However, key knowledge gaps remain around the timeframe and trajectory of woodland development and appropriate management practices. Natural colonisation and tree planting can be combined to meet diverse woodland objectives, but this has been little explored to date. Solutions . Land managers and advisors face uncertainty and many knowledge gaps when creating woodland through natural processes. Site monitoring and adaptive management can help meet site objectives that, in turn, can be supported by policies reflecting uncertainties in the process. Collaboration between researchers and land managers to monitor woodland development, use experimental approaches and share knowledge will help further applied ecological understanding, supporting informed decision‐making by land managers.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 6(4)
University of Stirling (GB), University of Leeds (GB), Natural England (GB), Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (GB), Royal Holloway University of London (GB), Nevill Hall Hospital (GB), Furness General Hospital (GB), National Alliance on Mental Illness (US), UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (GB), NovaBiotics (United Kingdom) (GB), University College of Estate Management (GB), Sheffield & Rotherham Wildlife Trust (GB), Forest Research (GB), National Trust (GB), Woodland Trust (GB), University of Plymouth (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.