A Mixed-methods Evaluation of Attitudes and Perceptions of Multispecialty Learners Undertaking a Hybrid Research Methodology Course in Low-resourced Settings

Background: Addressing the surgical burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires an increased number of medical researchers who understand local systems and resources. Advanced research training in medical programs in LMICs has been limited. To address this need, a hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was developed in a nurse anesthetist training program and expanded to surgery and anesthesiology training programs and an anesthesiology faculty development program in two countries. We assessed the effectiveness of the research methods course in strengthening research skills across anesthesiology and surgery specialties by evaluating participants’ attitudes and perceptions of the course. Methods: Using an online course survey, we collected qualitative and quantitative data on trainees’ perceptions of the course and their self-reported confidence to perform research competencies taught in the course. Quantitative data were analyzed through calculating descriptive statistics, and qualitative findings were reviewed through thematic coding. Results: Respondents were distributed across the three training programs as follows: surgical residency (n=17), registered nurse anesthetist (n=16), and anesthesiologist faculty development (n=3). Most (94%) agreed that they will use knowledge from this course. Using a scale of 1–5 with 5 corresponding to very confident, the respondents reported being confident in their abilities to engage in all phases of research consistent with the course competencies, with means ranging from 3.83 to 4.11. They were most confident in performing a scientific literature review and identifying a research topic. Conclusion: This course helped strengthen trainees’ confidence in the seven phases of conducting and disseminating research. The course helped trainees from different specialties and training programs build skills in research methods. This novel, hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was effective in building self-confidence for healthcare professionals across the practice continuum to tackle, develop, and perform research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4314/aas.v22i4.3
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Mixed-methods Evaluation of Attitudes and Perceptions of Multispecialty Learners Undertaking a Hybrid Research Methodology Course in Low-resourced Settings

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

A Mixed-methods Evaluation of Attitudes and Perceptions of Multispecialty Learners Undertaking a Hybrid Research Methodology Course in Low-resourced Settings

article en

Abstract

Background: Addressing the surgical burden of disease in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) requires an increased number of medical researchers who understand local systems and resources. Advanced research training in medical programs in LMICs has been limited. To address this need, a hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was developed in a nurse anesthetist training program and expanded to surgery and anesthesiology training programs and an anesthesiology faculty development program in two countries. We assessed the effectiveness of the research methods course in strengthening research skills across anesthesiology and surgery specialties by evaluating participants’ attitudes and perceptions of the course. Methods: Using an online course survey, we collected qualitative and quantitative data on trainees’ perceptions of the course and their self-reported confidence to perform research competencies taught in the course. Quantitative data were analyzed through calculating descriptive statistics, and qualitative findings were reviewed through thematic coding. Results: Respondents were distributed across the three training programs as follows: surgical residency (n=17), registered nurse anesthetist (n=16), and anesthesiologist faculty development (n=3). Most (94%) agreed that they will use knowledge from this course. Using a scale of 1–5 with 5 corresponding to very confident, the respondents reported being confident in their abilities to engage in all phases of research consistent with the course competencies, with means ranging from 3.83 to 4.11. They were most confident in performing a scientific literature review and identifying a research topic. Conclusion: This course helped strengthen trainees’ confidence in the seven phases of conducting and disseminating research. The course helped trainees from different specialties and training programs build skills in research methods. This novel, hybrid, flipped-classroom research methods course was effective in building self-confidence for healthcare professionals across the practice continuum to tackle, develop, and perform research.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Kenyatta University (KE), Kijabe Hospital (KE), Vanderbilt Health (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.