MON-162 Serum Fructosamine: A More Accurate Screening Test Than 3-Hour OGTT for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes

Abstract Disclosure: S. Exley: None. U.M. Kabadi: None. Background: Presently, ACOG and ADA recommend OGTTs for screening for diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). However, the validity of OGTTs are being questioned because OGTT results vary daily due to changing total content as well as type of carbohydrate intake during the previous few days, but especially the intake from dinner or bedtime snack the previous day. Moreover, reliability and accuracy of OGTTs are further compromised by lack of recommended preparation. Recent studies documented continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to be more reliable and accurate than OGTTs. Finally, we documented random serum Fructosamine concentration ≤ 198 mM/l with normal pregnancy and >198 mM/l in GDM, comparable to age matched non-pregnant women. However, some subjects with GDM based on 3-hour OGTT showed Fructosamine < 198 mM/l suggesting false positivity. Objective: Therefore, we assessed comparisons between Fructosamine and CGM for 2 weeks on one aspect, and 3-hour OGTT on the other. Subjects and Methods: We performed CGM at 24-30 weeks in 12 women, age 24-40 years. Three women with GDM (positive 3-hour OGTT) and Fructosamine <198 mM/l. Three women without GDM (normal OGTT) and six non-pregnant women. Diagnosis of GDM was established by abnormal 3-hour OGTT as adopted by current guidelines of ACOG and ADA. Cut off Fructosamine between women with and without GDM was 198 mM/l in a recent study. Results: Mean diurnal glucose levels with CGM were not significantly different amongst the three groups (GDM, 85-91 mg/dL; No GDM, 80-88 mg/dL; Non-pregnant, 75-94 mg/dL). The normal ranges of glucose (60-140mg/dL) on CGM were not significantly different either amongst all groups. Moreover, not a single glucose level was > 140 mg/dL in any group, including women with diagnosis of GDM by 3-hour OGTT and Fructosamine <198 mM/l. Conclusion: 3-hour OGTT may be false positive as confirmed by both CGM and random Fructosamine level in many pregnant women. Thus, CGM and random serum Fructosamine level are probably more accurate diagnostic tests of GDM in comparison to 3-hour OGTT. However, Fructosamine determination is distinctly more convenient, less expensive, and therefore more acceptable to pregnant women. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Endocrine Society
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaf149.1897
Primary Topic
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MON-162 Serum Fructosamine: A More Accurate Screening Test Than 3-Hour OGTT for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes

Journal of the Endocrine Society
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
article

MON-162 Serum Fructosamine: A More Accurate Screening Test Than 3-Hour OGTT for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes

article en

Abstract

Abstract Disclosure: S. Exley: None. U.M. Kabadi: None. Background: Presently, ACOG and ADA recommend OGTTs for screening for diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). However, the validity of OGTTs are being questioned because OGTT results vary daily due to changing total content as well as type of carbohydrate intake during the previous few days, but especially the intake from dinner or bedtime snack the previous day. Moreover, reliability and accuracy of OGTTs are further compromised by lack of recommended preparation. Recent studies documented continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to be more reliable and accurate than OGTTs. Finally, we documented random serum Fructosamine concentration ≤ 198 mM/l with normal pregnancy and >198 mM/l in GDM, comparable to age matched non-pregnant women. However, some subjects with GDM based on 3-hour OGTT showed Fructosamine < 198 mM/l suggesting false positivity. Objective: Therefore, we assessed comparisons between Fructosamine and CGM for 2 weeks on one aspect, and 3-hour OGTT on the other. Subjects and Methods: We performed CGM at 24-30 weeks in 12 women, age 24-40 years. Three women with GDM (positive 3-hour OGTT) and Fructosamine <198 mM/l. Three women without GDM (normal OGTT) and six non-pregnant women. Diagnosis of GDM was established by abnormal 3-hour OGTT as adopted by current guidelines of ACOG and ADA. Cut off Fructosamine between women with and without GDM was 198 mM/l in a recent study. Results: Mean diurnal glucose levels with CGM were not significantly different amongst the three groups (GDM, 85-91 mg/dL; No GDM, 80-88 mg/dL; Non-pregnant, 75-94 mg/dL). The normal ranges of glucose (60-140mg/dL) on CGM were not significantly different either amongst all groups. Moreover, not a single glucose level was > 140 mg/dL in any group, including women with diagnosis of GDM by 3-hour OGTT and Fructosamine <198 mM/l. Conclusion: 3-hour OGTT may be false positive as confirmed by both CGM and random Fructosamine level in many pregnant women. Thus, CGM and random serum Fructosamine level are probably more accurate diagnostic tests of GDM in comparison to 3-hour OGTT. However, Fructosamine determination is distinctly more convenient, less expensive, and therefore more acceptable to pregnant women. Presentation: Monday, July 14, 2025

Journal of the Endocrine SocietyVol. 9(Supplement_1)
Broadlawns Medical Center (US)
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.