Performativity in Science: Past and Future

ABSTRACT Performativity is the capacity of science to exert influence on the very phenomena it seeks to describe, for instance, when an economic prediction of a recession creates expectations which, in turn, make the occurrence of a recession more likely. Is this capacity something that threatens the epistemic import of science and its ethical integrity, or is it something that may have legitimate roles to play and that we might sometimes even cheer for? Although previous accounts tended to adopt a negative view, philosophers of science now increasingly grant performativity a productive role in science. This paper reviews this development and suggests pathways for future research. In particular, granting that performativity has legitimate roles to play does not imply that anything goes; rather, we then need to go about demarcating legitimate from illegitimate ways of dealing with this phenomenon. To give structure to this important research project, I suggest two broad families of demarcation strategies, one focused on aligning performativity with the epistemic goals of science and the other focused on the ethical and social desirability of performativity.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy Compass
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.70062
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
18.02

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performativity in Science: Past and Future

1 citations
Philosophy Compass
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
article

Performativity in Science: Past and Future

article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Performativity is the capacity of science to exert influence on the very phenomena it seeks to describe, for instance, when an economic prediction of a recession creates expectations which, in turn, make the occurrence of a recession more likely. Is this capacity something that threatens the epistemic import of science and its ethical integrity, or is it something that may have legitimate roles to play and that we might sometimes even cheer for? Although previous accounts tended to adopt a negative view, philosophers of science now increasingly grant performativity a productive role in science. This paper reviews this development and suggests pathways for future research. In particular, granting that performativity has legitimate roles to play does not imply that anything goes; rather, we then need to go about demarcating legitimate from illegitimate ways of dealing with this phenomenon. To give structure to this important research project, I suggest two broad families of demarcation strategies, one focused on aligning performativity with the epistemic goals of science and the other focused on the ethical and social desirability of performativity.

Philosophy CompassVol. 20(10)
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Philosophy and History of Science
18.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Performativity in Science: Past and Future · Philosophy Compass (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS