Project HOPE

The present study was designed to determine the effectiveness of a Social Cognitive Career Theory-based healthcare career intervention, as well as investigate whether addressing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare careers is more effective than a standard healthcare career-based intervention among a group of rural adolescents. Eighth grade students enrolled in a rural Midwest middle school were divided into four classrooms randomly assigned to receive the standard Project Health-care Opportunities, Preparation, and Exploration (HOPE) curriculum, or a COVID-19 pandemic-focused version. Participants responded to measures of healthcare career (HC) self-efficacy, HC outcome expectations, HC interests, as well as open ended questions regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their career interests and what careers they would like to pursue, before and after participating in Project HOPE. Repeated measures analysis of variances were conducted to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis methods were used to analyze responses to the open-ended survey questions. Findings of this study indicate no significant increase in the study variables from pretest to posttest, and no differences between the standard and pandemic-focused conditions. Students reported changes in career values, increased desires to help others, or no change in career ideas due to living through the COVID-19 pandemic. This study furthers the knowledge base regarding impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural adolescent career development, a population that has been overlooked in the existing career development literature examining impacts and influences of the COVID-19 pandemic on vocation.

Publication Details

Journal
Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Published
2024-09-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25820/etd.008093
Primary Topic
Career Development and Diversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Project HOPE

Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Career Development and Diversity
article

Project HOPE

article en

Abstract

The present study was designed to determine the effectiveness of a Social Cognitive Career Theory-based healthcare career intervention, as well as investigate whether addressing the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare careers is more effective than a standard healthcare career-based intervention among a group of rural adolescents. Eighth grade students enrolled in a rural Midwest middle school were divided into four classrooms randomly assigned to receive the standard Project Health-care Opportunities, Preparation, and Exploration (HOPE) curriculum, or a COVID-19 pandemic-focused version. Participants responded to measures of healthcare career (HC) self-efficacy, HC outcome expectations, HC interests, as well as open ended questions regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their career interests and what careers they would like to pursue, before and after participating in Project HOPE. Repeated measures analysis of variances were conducted to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis methods were used to analyze responses to the open-ended survey questions. Findings of this study indicate no significant increase in the study variables from pretest to posttest, and no differences between the standard and pandemic-focused conditions. Students reported changes in career values, increased desires to help others, or no change in career ideas due to living through the COVID-19 pandemic. This study furthers the knowledge base regarding impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on rural adolescent career development, a population that has been overlooked in the existing career development literature examining impacts and influences of the COVID-19 pandemic on vocation.

Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 38%
Career Development and Diversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.