P203 | IMPACT OF ABCB1 AND ABCG2 POLYMORPHISMS ON BCR∷ABL1 EXPRESSION ONE MONTH AFTER TKI SUSPENSION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

Background. Multidrug resistance proteins ABCB1 and ABCG2 are membrane transporters that can confer resistance to anticancer drugs, including Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). Various ABCB1 and ABCG2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were studied for their potential role to affect the transporter activity and their impact on clinical response in CML, but little is known about treatment free remission (TFR) achievement. Aim. To investigate the role of the most common ABCB1 and ABCG2 genetic polymorphisms in CML patients after TKI suspension in sustained Deep Molecular Response (DMR). Methods. We analyzed four ABCB1 polymorphisms (C3435T, G2677T, C1236T and T129C) and two ABCG2 polymorphisms (G34A and C421A) in 82 CP-CML patients (median age 67 years, range 28-94) who discontinued TKI therapy. We compared the rates of BCR∷ABL1 transcript detectability one month after TKI suspension across the different genotypes. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test in an additive model with the number of minor alleles (0, 1, or 2) as the predictor. Results. We found an association between a quantifiable (quant) BCR∷ABL1 transcript vs undetectable (und) one month after TFR and the ABCB1 SNPs C3435T (quant: CC=32%, CT=59%, TT=9% vs und: CC=23%, CT=46%, TT=31%, p=0.0413), G2677T (quant: GG=55%, GT=33%, TT=12% vs und: GG=27%, GT=46%, TT=27%, p=0.0132), and C1236T (quant: CC=50%, CT=41%, TT=9% vs und: CC=25%, CT=46%, TT=29%, p=0.0053), as well as the ABCG2 SNP G34A (quant: GG=82%, GA=14%, AA=4% vs und: GG=100%, GA=0%, AA=0%, p=0.0104). This SNP showed an even stronger association when quant BCR∷ABL1 is further divided between patients maintaining DMR and those in Major Molecular response (MMR) (MMR: GG=86%, GA=0%, AA=14% vs DMR: GG=80%, GA=20%, AA=0% vs und: GG=100%, GA=0%, AA=0% - p=0.0019). For the C1236T SNP, the association was also confirmed using the cut-off of 0.0051% BCR::ABL1, that we had previously defined as predictive of TFR maintenance (quant: CC=58%, CT=42%, TT=0% vs und: CC=27%, CT=47%, TT=26% - p=0.0134). Conclusions. Despite the relatively small sample size, our data suggest that ABCB1 and ABCG2 genotypes affect their function as drug transporters, and this may in some way influence the possibility of maintaining TFR after TKI stop.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P203 | IMPACT OF ABCB1 AND ABCG2 POLYMORPHISMS ON BCR∷ABL1 EXPRESSION ONE MONTH AFTER TKI SUSPENSION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
article

P203 | IMPACT OF ABCB1 AND ABCG2 POLYMORPHISMS ON BCR∷ABL1 EXPRESSION ONE MONTH AFTER TKI SUSPENSION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC MYELOID LEUKEMIA

article en

Abstract

Background. Multidrug resistance proteins ABCB1 and ABCG2 are membrane transporters that can confer resistance to anticancer drugs, including Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). Various ABCB1 and ABCG2 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were studied for their potential role to affect the transporter activity and their impact on clinical response in CML, but little is known about treatment free remission (TFR) achievement. Aim. To investigate the role of the most common ABCB1 and ABCG2 genetic polymorphisms in CML patients after TKI suspension in sustained Deep Molecular Response (DMR). Methods. We analyzed four ABCB1 polymorphisms (C3435T, G2677T, C1236T and T129C) and two ABCG2 polymorphisms (G34A and C421A) in 82 CP-CML patients (median age 67 years, range 28-94) who discontinued TKI therapy. We compared the rates of BCR∷ABL1 transcript detectability one month after TKI suspension across the different genotypes. Statistical analysis was performed using the Cochran-Armitage trend test in an additive model with the number of minor alleles (0, 1, or 2) as the predictor. Results. We found an association between a quantifiable (quant) BCR∷ABL1 transcript vs undetectable (und) one month after TFR and the ABCB1 SNPs C3435T (quant: CC=32%, CT=59%, TT=9% vs und: CC=23%, CT=46%, TT=31%, p=0.0413), G2677T (quant: GG=55%, GT=33%, TT=12% vs und: GG=27%, GT=46%, TT=27%, p=0.0132), and C1236T (quant: CC=50%, CT=41%, TT=9% vs und: CC=25%, CT=46%, TT=29%, p=0.0053), as well as the ABCG2 SNP G34A (quant: GG=82%, GA=14%, AA=4% vs und: GG=100%, GA=0%, AA=0%, p=0.0104). This SNP showed an even stronger association when quant BCR∷ABL1 is further divided between patients maintaining DMR and those in Major Molecular response (MMR) (MMR: GG=86%, GA=0%, AA=14% vs DMR: GG=80%, GA=20%, AA=0% vs und: GG=100%, GA=0%, AA=0% - p=0.0019). For the C1236T SNP, the association was also confirmed using the cut-off of 0.0051% BCR::ABL1, that we had previously defined as predictive of TFR maintenance (quant: CC=58%, CT=42%, TT=0% vs und: CC=27%, CT=47%, TT=26% - p=0.0134). Conclusions. Despite the relatively small sample size, our data suggest that ABCB1 and ABCG2 genotypes affect their function as drug transporters, and this may in some way influence the possibility of maintaining TFR after TKI stop.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
University of Udine (IT), Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT), Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Trieste (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.