P048 | MAINTENANCE WITH RITUXIMAB IN POST-INDUCTION MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA: YES OR NO? OUR EXPERIENCE WITH LONG FOLLOW-UP.

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is a B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) that accounts for approximately 5%–17% of all NHL in adults The three major subtypes of MZL defined by the World Health Organization (WHO)—are splenic MZL, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) MZL, and nodal MZ. numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of rituximab in combination with chemotherapy regimens, with an overall improved response rate of up to 90%–100%. Despite the improved response and progression or event-free survival rates achieved with first-line rituximab-containing regimens, relapses still persist once the treatment is completed. Here we report the results and long follow-up of our study evaluating the effect of rituximab-maintenance or not treatment following R-based therapy as a first-line therapy on the progression free and overall survival of MZL patients. from 2011 to 2023 we treated 60 patients with marginal NHL (27 F; 33 M) with a median age of 66 years (range 42-86 years); 34 splenic; 13 nodal and 13 MALT. Patients treated in induction with R-Benda: 34(56%); R-alone: ​​18(30%); R-FluCy: 4(7%); R-CVP: 3(5%); R-CHOP: 1(2%). ORR was documented in 58/60(97%). 36/58(62%) accepted maintenance therapy with rituximab and 22/50(38%) did not. With a median observation of 65 months (range 7-164 months) the PFS is 88% vs 50% (p:0.002) and the OS is 82% vs 44% (p:0.007) respectively in the M and no M groups with a statistically significant difference. 15/58(26%) died; 5/36(14%) in group M, 3 for viral infections (2 COVID and 1 encephalitis) and 2 for other causes; in the no M group 10/22(45%): 3 from lymphoma; 3 for viral infections (2 COVID and 1 CMV) and 4 for other causes. In conclusion from our experience, maintenance with rituximab improves the results in patients with marginal lymphoma with a relatively low impact on complications related to infectious problems. The new drugs active in the treatment of marginal lymphomas (BTK inhibitors) in association with anti-CD20 could the future for evaluating a chemotherapy-free term therapy (after 2 years) in the first line, impacting both the quality of life and the results or adverse events in this cohort of patients.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

P048 | MAINTENANCE WITH RITUXIMAB IN POST-INDUCTION MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA: YES OR NO? OUR EXPERIENCE WITH LONG FOLLOW-UP.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

P048 | MAINTENANCE WITH RITUXIMAB IN POST-INDUCTION MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA: YES OR NO? OUR EXPERIENCE WITH LONG FOLLOW-UP.

article en

Abstract

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is a B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) that accounts for approximately 5%–17% of all NHL in adults The three major subtypes of MZL defined by the World Health Organization (WHO)—are splenic MZL, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) MZL, and nodal MZ. numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of rituximab in combination with chemotherapy regimens, with an overall improved response rate of up to 90%–100%. Despite the improved response and progression or event-free survival rates achieved with first-line rituximab-containing regimens, relapses still persist once the treatment is completed. Here we report the results and long follow-up of our study evaluating the effect of rituximab-maintenance or not treatment following R-based therapy as a first-line therapy on the progression free and overall survival of MZL patients. from 2011 to 2023 we treated 60 patients with marginal NHL (27 F; 33 M) with a median age of 66 years (range 42-86 years); 34 splenic; 13 nodal and 13 MALT. Patients treated in induction with R-Benda: 34(56%); R-alone: ​​18(30%); R-FluCy: 4(7%); R-CVP: 3(5%); R-CHOP: 1(2%). ORR was documented in 58/60(97%). 36/58(62%) accepted maintenance therapy with rituximab and 22/50(38%) did not. With a median observation of 65 months (range 7-164 months) the PFS is 88% vs 50% (p:0.002) and the OS is 82% vs 44% (p:0.007) respectively in the M and no M groups with a statistically significant difference. 15/58(26%) died; 5/36(14%) in group M, 3 for viral infections (2 COVID and 1 encephalitis) and 2 for other causes; in the no M group 10/22(45%): 3 from lymphoma; 3 for viral infections (2 COVID and 1 CMV) and 4 for other causes. In conclusion from our experience, maintenance with rituximab improves the results in patients with marginal lymphoma with a relatively low impact on complications related to infectious problems. The new drugs active in the treatment of marginal lymphomas (BTK inhibitors) in association with anti-CD20 could the future for evaluating a chemotherapy-free term therapy (after 2 years) in the first line, impacting both the quality of life and the results or adverse events in this cohort of patients.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ospedali Riuniti San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

P048 | MAINTENANCE WITH RITUXIMAB IN POST-INDUCTION MARGINAL ZONE LYMPHOMA: YES OR NO? OUR EXPERIENCE WITH LONG FOLLOW-UP. · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS