DP115 | PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF 18F-FDG-PET/CT AND 68GA-PSMA-PET/CT FOR STAGING OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

Background: <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT is the most used technique to detect bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) and is recommended for response assessment. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in tumors with neoangiogenesis, including MM. Aims and Methods: We present a prospective single-center study aimed at evaluating diagnostic performance of PSMA-PET in MM through comparison to FDG-PET. Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (ND)MM underwent both scans within 14 days before start of any treatment. The scans were compared in terms of n°of focal lesions (FLs), paraskeletal disease (PSD), diffuse bone marrow (BM) uptake and SUV<sub>max</sub>. Results: 51 pts were enrolled. In terms of positivity/negativity, 40 pts(78%) had concordant scans: 23(45%) were positive (pos) and 17(33%) negative (neg). Among discordant pts(22%), 9(18%) had pos FDG and 2(4%) had pos PSMA(k=0.57). FLs were detected in 27 pts(53%): FDG-PET detected FLs in 26(51%) with 7(14%) having neg PSMA; PSMA-PET detected FLs in 20(39%) with 1(2%) having neg FDG. In 8 pts(16%) FDG and PSMA-PET detected the same n°of FLs; in 13(25%) and 6 pts(12%) FDG and PSMA revealed a higher n°of FLs than the other tracer respectively (p=0.09). Median SUV<sub>max</sub> of FLs was 5.7 for FDG and 5.2 for PSMA. 1 pt had PSMA uptake in FLs resulting higher than physiologic liver uptake (reference for radioligand therapy indication). PSD lesions were detected in 10 pts(20%) by FDG-PET and in 9 pts(18%) by PSMA-PET. Median SUV<sub>max</sub> of PSD was 5.5 for FDG and 4.7 for PSMA. 2 pts had PSMA uptake in PSD lesions resulting higher than liver. Regarding BM diffuse uptake, 36 pts(71%) had concordant scans: 5(10%) were pos and 31(61%) were neg by both tracers. Among discordant pts, 12(23%) had pos FDG and 3(6%) had pos PSMA-PET(k = 0.24). Median SUV<sub>max</sub> of BM was 4.8 for FDG and 3.3 for PSMA. Conclusion: According to our results, in NDMM pts FDG-PET features a positivity rate resulting higher in detecting FLs and BM diffuse uptake and similar in detecting PSD lesions as compared to PSMA-PET. PSMA uptake of FLs and/or PSD lesions had higher values than physiologic liver uptake only in 2 pts. Due to these observations, lack of standardization in response assessment, short half-life requiring local cyclotron for on-site production and high costs, PSMA does not seem optimal for imaging or theranostics in NDMM pts. It is not excluded that PSMA uptake may be higher in advanced phases of MM, characterized by further increase of neoangiogenesis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

DP115 | PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF 18F-FDG-PET/CT AND 68GA-PSMA-PET/CT FOR STAGING OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

DP115 | PROSPECTIVE COMPARISON OF 18F-FDG-PET/CT AND 68GA-PSMA-PET/CT FOR STAGING OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA

article en

Abstract

Background: <sup>18</sup>F-FDG-PET/CT is the most used technique to detect bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM) and is recommended for response assessment. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is overexpressed in tumors with neoangiogenesis, including MM. Aims and Methods: We present a prospective single-center study aimed at evaluating diagnostic performance of PSMA-PET in MM through comparison to FDG-PET. Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (ND)MM underwent both scans within 14 days before start of any treatment. The scans were compared in terms of n°of focal lesions (FLs), paraskeletal disease (PSD), diffuse bone marrow (BM) uptake and SUV<sub>max</sub>. Results: 51 pts were enrolled. In terms of positivity/negativity, 40 pts(78%) had concordant scans: 23(45%) were positive (pos) and 17(33%) negative (neg). Among discordant pts(22%), 9(18%) had pos FDG and 2(4%) had pos PSMA(k=0.57). FLs were detected in 27 pts(53%): FDG-PET detected FLs in 26(51%) with 7(14%) having neg PSMA; PSMA-PET detected FLs in 20(39%) with 1(2%) having neg FDG. In 8 pts(16%) FDG and PSMA-PET detected the same n°of FLs; in 13(25%) and 6 pts(12%) FDG and PSMA revealed a higher n°of FLs than the other tracer respectively (p=0.09). Median SUV<sub>max</sub> of FLs was 5.7 for FDG and 5.2 for PSMA. 1 pt had PSMA uptake in FLs resulting higher than physiologic liver uptake (reference for radioligand therapy indication). PSD lesions were detected in 10 pts(20%) by FDG-PET and in 9 pts(18%) by PSMA-PET. Median SUV<sub>max</sub> of PSD was 5.5 for FDG and 4.7 for PSMA. 2 pts had PSMA uptake in PSD lesions resulting higher than liver. Regarding BM diffuse uptake, 36 pts(71%) had concordant scans: 5(10%) were pos and 31(61%) were neg by both tracers. Among discordant pts, 12(23%) had pos FDG and 3(6%) had pos PSMA-PET(k = 0.24). Median SUV<sub>max</sub> of BM was 4.8 for FDG and 3.3 for PSMA. Conclusion: According to our results, in NDMM pts FDG-PET features a positivity rate resulting higher in detecting FLs and BM diffuse uptake and similar in detecting PSD lesions as compared to PSMA-PET. PSMA uptake of FLs and/or PSD lesions had higher values than physiologic liver uptake only in 2 pts. Due to these observations, lack of standardization in response assessment, short half-life requiring local cyclotron for on-site production and high costs, PSMA does not seem optimal for imaging or theranostics in NDMM pts. It is not excluded that PSMA uptake may be higher in advanced phases of MM, characterized by further increase of neoangiogenesis.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Istituto di Ematologia di Bologna (IT), Azienda USL di Bologna (IT), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), University of Bologna (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.