C003 | MODELING LONG-TERM PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL IN TRANSPLANT-ELIGIBLE AND TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED WITH DARATUMUMAB, BORTEZOMIB, LENALIDOMIDE, AND DEXAMETHASONE

Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVRd) plus DR maintenance showed superior efficacy to VRd with R maintenance in transplant-eligible (TE) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the PERSEUS trial. Similarly, the CEPHEUS trial showed superiority of DVRd vs VRd in transplant-ineligible (TIE) or transplant-deferred pts with NDMM. In the DVRd arms, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) at median follow-up of 47.5 months (mo; PERSEUS) and 58.7 mo (CEPHEUS); in the VRd arms, median PFS was NR in PERSEUS and was 52.6 mo in CEPHEUS. This analysis aimed to extrapolate PFS data from PERSEUS (TE) and CEPHEUS (TIE) to estimate long-term outcomes of frontline DVRd to help inform clinical decision making. Per UK NICE guidance on survival data extrapolation, 7 distributions were fitted to model PFS: exponential, Weibull, gamma, Gompertz, log-logistic, log-normal, and generalized gamma. Individual parametric curves were fit for the DVRd and VRd groups. Extrapolations were capped by UK population data (2020–2022) on disease-specific and all-cause mortality, using median population age and the proportion of males in the cohort at treatment initiation. PFS projections begin at the median population age. In PERSEUS, 709 TE pts were randomized (DVRd, n=355; VRd, n=354; median age, 60 yrs; 59% male). In CEPHEUS, 289 TIE pts were randomized (DVRd, n=144; VRd, n=145; median age, 72 yrs; 51% male). At 48 mo, Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS in PERSEUS TE pts were 84.3% vs 67.7% for DVRd and VRd, respectively; in CEPHEUS TIE pts, they were 72.3% vs 52.3% (Figure). Based on modeling in PERSEUS TE pts, estimated median PFS was 158–255 mo (13.2–21.2 yrs) for DVRd and 76–119 mo (6.3–9.9 yrs) for VRd. Exponential distribution (best fit) gave PFS estimates of 205 vs 87 mo (17.1 vs 7.3 yrs) for DVRd and VRd, respectively. In CEPHEUS TIE pts, estimated median PFS was 96–118 mo (8.0–9.8 yrs) for DVRd and 52–54 mo (4.3–4.5 yrs) for VRd. Exponential distribution gave PFS estimates of 100 vs 53 mo (8.3 vs 4.4 yrs) for DVRd and VRd, respectively. PFS projections were significantly longer with DVRd vs VRd in both TE and TIE pts with NDMM. As expected, projected PFS with DVRd was longer for TE (205 mo from baseline age of 60 yrs) vs TIE (100 mo from age 72 yrs). These extrapolations support DVRd use beyond observed PFS data, helping to reinforce the benefit of DVRd with daratumumab-containing maintenance in all pts with NDMM.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-09-01
Primary Topic
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

C003 | MODELING LONG-TERM PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL IN TRANSPLANT-ELIGIBLE AND TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED WITH DARATUMUMAB, BORTEZOMIB, LENALIDOMIDE, AND DEXAMETHASONE

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
article

C003 | MODELING LONG-TERM PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL IN TRANSPLANT-ELIGIBLE AND TRANSPLANT-INELIGIBLE NEWLY DIAGNOSED MULTIPLE MYELOMA TREATED WITH DARATUMUMAB, BORTEZOMIB, LENALIDOMIDE, AND DEXAMETHASONE

article en

Abstract

Daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (DVRd) plus DR maintenance showed superior efficacy to VRd with R maintenance in transplant-eligible (TE) patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) in the PERSEUS trial. Similarly, the CEPHEUS trial showed superiority of DVRd vs VRd in transplant-ineligible (TIE) or transplant-deferred pts with NDMM. In the DVRd arms, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) at median follow-up of 47.5 months (mo; PERSEUS) and 58.7 mo (CEPHEUS); in the VRd arms, median PFS was NR in PERSEUS and was 52.6 mo in CEPHEUS. This analysis aimed to extrapolate PFS data from PERSEUS (TE) and CEPHEUS (TIE) to estimate long-term outcomes of frontline DVRd to help inform clinical decision making. Per UK NICE guidance on survival data extrapolation, 7 distributions were fitted to model PFS: exponential, Weibull, gamma, Gompertz, log-logistic, log-normal, and generalized gamma. Individual parametric curves were fit for the DVRd and VRd groups. Extrapolations were capped by UK population data (2020–2022) on disease-specific and all-cause mortality, using median population age and the proportion of males in the cohort at treatment initiation. PFS projections begin at the median population age. In PERSEUS, 709 TE pts were randomized (DVRd, n=355; VRd, n=354; median age, 60 yrs; 59% male). In CEPHEUS, 289 TIE pts were randomized (DVRd, n=144; VRd, n=145; median age, 72 yrs; 51% male). At 48 mo, Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS in PERSEUS TE pts were 84.3% vs 67.7% for DVRd and VRd, respectively; in CEPHEUS TIE pts, they were 72.3% vs 52.3% (Figure). Based on modeling in PERSEUS TE pts, estimated median PFS was 158–255 mo (13.2–21.2 yrs) for DVRd and 76–119 mo (6.3–9.9 yrs) for VRd. Exponential distribution (best fit) gave PFS estimates of 205 vs 87 mo (17.1 vs 7.3 yrs) for DVRd and VRd, respectively. In CEPHEUS TIE pts, estimated median PFS was 96–118 mo (8.0–9.8 yrs) for DVRd and 52–54 mo (4.3–4.5 yrs) for VRd. Exponential distribution gave PFS estimates of 100 vs 53 mo (8.3 vs 4.4 yrs) for DVRd and VRd, respectively. PFS projections were significantly longer with DVRd vs VRd in both TE and TIE pts with NDMM. As expected, projected PFS with DVRd was longer for TE (205 mo from baseline age of 60 yrs) vs TIE (100 mo from age 72 yrs). These extrapolations support DVRd use beyond observed PFS data, helping to reinforce the benefit of DVRd with daratumumab-containing maintenance in all pts with NDMM.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Ithaka Harbors (US), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of Calgary (CA), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Hotel Dieu Hospital (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille (FR), São Germano Oncologia (BR), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Johnson & Johnson (Israel) (IL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Turin (IT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.